These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26072277)

  • 1. Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution.
    Gervais WM
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():312-21. PubMed ID: 26072277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.
    Pennycook G; Cheyne JA; Seli P; Koehler DJ; Fugelsang JA
    Cognition; 2012 Jun; 123(3):335-46. PubMed ID: 22481051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief.
    Gervais WM; Norenzayan A
    Science; 2012 Apr; 336(6080):493-6. PubMed ID: 22539725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive mechanisms for the evolution of religious thought.
    Fondevila S; Martín-Loeches M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 Sep; 1299():84-90. PubMed ID: 25708083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The perceived stability and biological basis of religious beliefs, factual beliefs, and opinions.
    Heiphetz L; Gelman SA; Young LL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Apr; 156():82-98. PubMed ID: 28056437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The divided mind of a disbeliever: Intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults.
    Järnefelt E; Canfield CF; Kelemen D
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():72-88. PubMed ID: 25880608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Teleology and the intentions of supernatural agents.
    Roberts AJ; Wastell CA; Polito V
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Apr; 80():102905. PubMed ID: 32155580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interhemispheric interaction and beliefs on our origin: degree of handedness predicts beliefs in creationism versus evolution.
    Niebauer CL; Christman SD; Reid SA; Garvey KJ
    Laterality; 2004 Oct; 9(4):433-47. PubMed ID: 15513240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytic cognitive style predicts paranormal explanations of anomalous experiences but not the experiences themselves: Implications for cognitive theories of delusions.
    Ross RM; Hartig B; McKay R
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():90-96. PubMed ID: 27692466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-Reflective Thinkers Are Predisposed to Attribute Supernatural Causation to Uncanny Experiences.
    Bouvet R; Bonnefon JF
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jul; 41(7):955-61. PubMed ID: 25948700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Creationism and conspiracism share a common teleological bias.
    Wagner-Egger P; Delouvée S; Gauvrit N; Dieguez S
    Curr Biol; 2018 Aug; 28(16):R867-R868. PubMed ID: 30130503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supernatural Belief Is Not Modulated by Intuitive Thinking Style or Cognitive Inhibition.
    Farias M; van Mulukom V; Kahane G; Kreplin U; Joyce A; Soares P; Oviedo L; Hernu M; Rokita K; Savulescu J; Möttönen R
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15100. PubMed ID: 29118434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open-Minded Cognition.
    Price E; Ottati V; Wilson C; Kim S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1488-504. PubMed ID: 26315581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In the name of God: How children and adults judge agents who act for religious versus secular reasons.
    Heiphetz L; Spelke ES; Young LL
    Cognition; 2015 Nov; 144():134-49. PubMed ID: 26275836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting the Relationship between Individual Differences in Analytic Thinking and Religious Belief: Evidence That Measurement Order Moderates Their Inverse Correlation.
    Finley AJ; Tang D; Schmeichel BJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138922. PubMed ID: 26402334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Religious beliefs are factual beliefs: Content does not correlate with context sensitivity.
    Levy N
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():109-116. PubMed ID: 28161595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis.
    Pennycook G; Ross RM; Koehler DJ; Fugelsang JA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153039. PubMed ID: 27054566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why I teach the controversy: using creationism to teach critical thinking.
    Honey PL
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():793. PubMed ID: 26136700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive styles and religion.
    Yilmaz O
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2021 Aug; 40():150-154. PubMed ID: 33130329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experiential thinking in creationism--a textual analysis.
    Nieminen P; Ryökäs E; Mustonen AM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118314. PubMed ID: 25734650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.