These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2607289)

  • 1. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of the efficacy of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Goodman A; Reader A; Beck M; Melfi R; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1985 Jun; 11(6):249-56. PubMed ID: 3861764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic debridement comparing sodium hypochlorite and water.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 1919404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars.
    Burleson A; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2007 Jul; 33(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 17804312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scanning electron microscope observation of canal cleanliness.
    Mandel E; Machtou P; Friedman S
    J Endod; 1990 Jun; 16(6):279-83. PubMed ID: 2074426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Canal debridement: effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide as medicaments.
    Yang SF; Rivera EM; Walton RE; Baumgardner KR
    J Endod; 1996 Oct; 22(10):521-5. PubMed ID: 9198438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic appliances on root canal debridement].
    Chen CP; Yeh CL; Yang YK; Ma CC; Nieh S
    Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1990 Jun; 9(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 2104285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
    Gutarts R; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2005 Mar; 31(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 15735461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after "one-visit" endodontic treatment.
    Nair PN; Henry S; Cano V; Vera J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):231-52. PubMed ID: 15660098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ex vivo microscopic assessment of factors affecting the quality of apical seal created by root-end fillings.
    Tobón-Arroyave SI; Restrepo-Pérez MM; Arismendi-Echavarría JA; Velásquez-Restrepo Z; Marín-Botero ML; García-Dorado EC
    Int Endod J; 2007 Aug; 40(8):590-602. PubMed ID: 17511788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
    Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique for 1 and 3 minutes.
    Lev R; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1987 Nov; 13(11):523-30. PubMed ID: 3482096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [SEM studies on root canal preparation using ultrasound].
    Beer R; Gängler P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 2639044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
    Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
    J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
    Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
    J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.