161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26073650)
1. Improved speech reception and sound quality with the DUET2 audio processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
Kleine Punte A; Mertens G; Cochet E; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(10):1022-9. PubMed ID: 26073650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new audio processor for combined electric and acoustic stimulation for the treatment of partial deafness.
Lorens A; Zgoda M; Skarzynski H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 132(7):739-50. PubMed ID: 22668312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
Helbig S; Baumann U
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():81-87. PubMed ID: 19955724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preliminary results of DUET to DUET 2 upgrade.
Lorens A; Zgoda M; Waskiewicz B; Lutek A; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():75-8. PubMed ID: 21756586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.
Kong YY; Stickney GS; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1351-61. PubMed ID: 15807023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.
Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
Gstoettner WK; Van de Heyning P; O'Connor AF; Kiefer J; Morera C; Sainz M; Vermeire K; McDonald S; Cavallé L; Valdecasas JG; Adunka OF; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Helbig S
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 21997337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.
Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
Neben N; Buechner A; Schuessler M; Lenarz T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 29214896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants.
Liepins R; Kaider A; Honeder C; Auinger AB; Dahm V; Riss D; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 392():107970. PubMed ID: 32339775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception.
Yund EW; Woods DL
Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 20562624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino.
Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 127(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17762993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
