These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26073974)

  • 1. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers.
    Rathbone J; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():80. PubMed ID: 26073974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool.
    Gates A; Johnson C; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):45. PubMed ID: 29530097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A text-mining tool generated title-abstract screening workload savings: performance evaluation versus single-human screening.
    Carey N; Harte M; Mc Cullagh L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Sep; 149():53-59. PubMed ID: 35654270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
    Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decoding semi-automated title-abstract screening: findings from a convenience sample of reviews.
    Gates A; Gates M; DaRosa D; Elliott SA; Pillay J; Rahman S; Vandermeer B; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):272. PubMed ID: 33243276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer.
    Tsou AY; Treadwell JR; Erinoff E; Schoelles K
    Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 9(1):73. PubMed ID: 32241297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of text mining to reduce screening workload for injury-focused systematic reviews.
    Giummarra MJ; Lau G; Gabbe BJ
    Inj Prev; 2020 Feb; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 31451565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews.
    Gates A; Gates M; Sebastianski M; Guitard S; Elliott SA; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 32493228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews.
    Wallace BC; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Brodley C; Schmid CH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():55. PubMed ID: 20102628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity and Specificity of Using GPT-3.5 Turbo Models for Title and Abstract Screening in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
    Tran VT; Gartlehner G; Yaacoub S; Boutron I; Schwingshackl L; Stadelmaier J; Sommer I; Alebouyeh F; Afach S; Meerpohl J; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2024 Jun; 177(6):791-799. PubMed ID: 38768452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of machine learning softwares to screen titles of systematic reviews: a methodological study.
    Dos Reis AHS; de Oliveira ALM; Fritsch C; Zouch J; Ferreira P; Polese JC
    Syst Rev; 2023 Apr; 12(1):68. PubMed ID: 37061711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a traditional systematic review approach with review-of-reviews and semi-automation as strategies to update the evidence.
    Reddy SM; Patel S; Weyrich M; Fenton J; Viswanathan M
    Syst Rev; 2020 Oct; 9(1):243. PubMed ID: 33076975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.
    Pham B; Jovanovic J; Bagheri E; Antony J; Ashoor H; Nguyen TT; Rios P; Robson R; Thomas SM; Watt J; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):156. PubMed ID: 34039433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews.
    Rathbone J; Albarqouni L; Bakhit M; Beller E; Byambasuren O; Hoffmann T; Scott AM; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):233. PubMed ID: 29178925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews.
    Wang Z; Nayfeh T; Tetzlaff J; O'Blenis P; Murad MH
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227742. PubMed ID: 31935267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unsupervised title and abstract screening for systematic review: a retrospective case-study using topic modelling methodology.
    Natukunda A; Muchene LK
    Syst Rev; 2023 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 36597132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.