These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26074084)

  • 1. Circular displays: control/display arrangements and stereotype strength with eight different display locations.
    Chan AH; Hoffmann ER
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(12):1983-95. PubMed ID: 26074084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of display location on control-display stereotype strength for translational and rotational controls with linear displays.
    Chan AH; Hoffmann ER
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(12):1996-2015. PubMed ID: 26147193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of display movement angle, indicator type and display location on control/display stereotype strength.
    Hoffmann ER; Chan AHS
    Ergonomics; 2017 Aug; 60(8):1146-1157. PubMed ID: 27762172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Movement compatibility for frontal controls with displays located in four cardinal orientations.
    Chan AH; Hoffmann ER
    Ergonomics; 2010 Dec; 53(12):1403-19. PubMed ID: 21108078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Movement compatibility for configurations of displays located in three cardinal orientations and ipsilateral, contralateral and overhead controls.
    Chan AH; Hoffmann ER
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):128-40. PubMed ID: 21531381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining the validity of the visual field principle for designing control/display arrangements.
    Hoffmann ER; Chan AHS; Man SS; Chan LCM
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102887. PubMed ID: 31422265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Worringham and Beringer 'visual field' principle for rotary controls.
    Hoffmann ER; Chan AH
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(10):1620-4. PubMed ID: 23875538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Psychological Cost of Making Control Responses in the Nonstereotype Direction.
    Chan AH; Hoffmann ER
    Hum Factors; 2016 Dec; 58(8):1173-1186. PubMed ID: 27461109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation modelling of reaction time for two- and three-dimensional stimulus-response arrangements.
    Hoffmann ER; Chan AH; Chan KW
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(10):1608-19. PubMed ID: 23906025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display--Computer Simulated Test and real Hardware Test.
    Chan WH; Chan AH
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 12523806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strength and reversibility of stereotypes for a rotary control with linear scales.
    Chan AH; Chan WH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):341-53. PubMed ID: 18459383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Another test of sensor lines on control panels.
    Chapanis A; Yoblick DA
    Ergonomics; 2001 Nov; 44(14):1302-11. PubMed ID: 11900420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple two-dimensional displays as an alternative to three-dimensional displays in telerobotic tasks.
    Park SH; Woldstad JC
    Hum Factors; 2000; 42(4):592-603. PubMed ID: 11324852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population Stereotypes for Objects and Representations: Response Tendencies for Interacting With Everyday Objects and Interfaces.
    Vu KL; Sun Y
    Hum Factors; 2019 Sep; 61(6):953-975. PubMed ID: 30689448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emergent features and perceptual objects: re-examining fundamental principles in analogical display design.
    Holt J; Bennett KB; Flach JM
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(12):1960-73. PubMed ID: 26218496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of testing realism on experimentally obtained stereotype strength.
    Hoffmann ER; Whitfield RC;
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Jan; 42(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 20832769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directional stimulus-response compatibility: a test of three alternative principles.
    Worringham CJ; Beringer DB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):864-80. PubMed ID: 9629069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nomination of controls of various layouts for heavy machinery.
    Chan AHS; Siu YS; Hoffmann ER
    Work; 2019; 64(3):531-544. PubMed ID: 31658086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Children's Control/Display Stereotypes.
    Hoffmann ER; Chan AHS; Tai JPC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):538-555. PubMed ID: 29481291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advanced methods for displays and remote control of robots.
    Eliav A; Lavie T; Parmet Y; Stern H; Edan Y
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Nov; 42(6):820-9. PubMed ID: 21376306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.