260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26074305)
1. The effect of the resistive properties of bone on neural excitation and electric fields in cochlear implant models.
Malherbe TK; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():126-35. PubMed ID: 26074305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Constructing a three-dimensional electrical model of a living cochlear implant user's cochlea.
Malherbe TK; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 26430919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.
Kim JS; Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.
Vanpoucke FJ; Zarowski AJ; Peeters SA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2174-83. PubMed ID: 15605865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants.
Smit JE; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 19464523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling surface potentials from intracochlear electrical stimulation.
Mens LH; Huiskamp G; Oostendorp T; van den Broek P
Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 10572970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection.
Zhou N; Dong L
Trends Hear; 2017 Jan; 21():2331216517690108. PubMed ID: 28150534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The facial nerve canal: an important cochlear conduction path revealed by Clarion electrical field imaging.
Vanpoucke F; Zarowski A; Casselman J; Frijns J; Peeters S
Otol Neurotol; 2004 May; 25(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 15129106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.
Berenstein CK; Vanpoucke FJ; Mulder JJ; Mens LH
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):28-38. PubMed ID: 20946945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Summating Potential Is a Reliable Marker of Electrode Position in Electrocochleography: Cochlear Implant as a Theragnostic Probe.
Helmstaedter V; Lenarz T; Erfurt P; Kral A; Baumhoff P
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):687-700. PubMed ID: 29251689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrical resistivity measurements in the mammalian cochlea after neural degeneration.
Micco AG; Richter CP
Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1334-41. PubMed ID: 16885732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.
Sato M; Baumhoff P; Kral A
J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 26740649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current focussing in cochlear implants: an analysis of neural recruitment in a computational model.
Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():89-98. PubMed ID: 25528491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation.
Banakis Hartl RM; Mattingly JK; Greene NT; Jenkins HA; Cass SP; Tollin DJ
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1291-9. PubMed ID: 27579835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of electrical stimulation on the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response in guinea pigs with a high-frequency hearing loss.
Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Grolman W; Klis SF
Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 272(1-2):95-107. PubMed ID: 21044671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research.
Rebscher SJ; Hetherington AM; Snyder RL; Leake PA; Bonham BH
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17727956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stimulation of the facial nerve by intracochlear electrodes in otosclerosis: a computer modeling study.
Frijns JH; Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19574948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the spread of electric field on neural excitation in cochlear implant users: Transimpedance and spread of excitation measurements.
Kopsch AC; Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 424():108591. PubMed ID: 35914395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear implantation for chronic electrical stimulation in the mouse.
Irving S; Trotter MI; Fallon JB; Millard RE; Shepherd RK; Wise AK
Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():37-45. PubMed ID: 24055621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
