These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26074798)

  • 1. Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes.
    Schindler S; Wolff W; Kissler JM; Brand R
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():139. PubMed ID: 26074798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Englert C; Brand R; Kissler J
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 May; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27142046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of implicitly incentivized faking on explicit and implicit measures of doping attitude: when athletes want to pretend an even more negative attitude to doping.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Brand R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0118507. PubMed ID: 25902142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cerebral Correlates of Automatic Associations Towards Performance Enhancing Substances.
    Schindler S; Wolff W
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1923. PubMed ID: 26733914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intentional faking of the single category Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Association Test.
    Stieger S; Göritz AS; Hergovich A; Voracek M
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 22049663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the implicit association test immune to faking?
    Steffens MC
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 15267125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff: Construct- and faking-related variance on the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Röhner J; Ewers T
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):243-58. PubMed ID: 25701107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exaggeration is harder than understatement, but practice makes perfect!
    Röhner J; Schröder-Abé M; Schütz A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 21592941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Illegal performance enhancing drugs and doping in sport: a picture-based brief implicit association test for measuring athletes' attitudes.
    Brand R; Heck P; Ziegler M
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2014 Jan; 9():7. PubMed ID: 24479865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Capturing doping attitudes by self-report declarations and implicit assessment: a methodology study.
    Petróczi A; Aidman EV; Nepusz T
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2008 Apr; 3():9. PubMed ID: 18426575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural Patterns of the Implicit Association Test.
    Healy GF; Boran L; Smeaton AF
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():605. PubMed ID: 26635570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cyberfaking: I can, so I will? Intentions to fake in online psychological testing.
    Grieve R; Elliott J
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 May; 16(5):364-9. PubMed ID: 23574347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management.
    Farrow TF; Burgess J; Wilkinson ID; Hunter MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 67():159-74. PubMed ID: 25527112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. IAT faking indices revisited: Aspects of replicability and differential validity.
    Röhner J; Holden RR; Schütz A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):670-693. PubMed ID: 35441359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neural correlates of identity faking and concealment: an FMRI study.
    Ding XP; Du X; Lei D; Hu CS; Fu G; Chen G
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e48639. PubMed ID: 23144915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Employing automatic approach and avoidance tendencies for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept: The implicit association procedure (IAP).
    Schnabel K; Banse R; Asendorpf J
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16610274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes.
    Deng Z; Guo J; Wang D; Huang T; Chen Z
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2022 Apr; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 35473803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intentional response distortion on personality tests: using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking.
    van Hooft EA; Born MP
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Mar; 97(2):301-16. PubMed ID: 21967296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nothing but the truth? Effects of faking on the validity of the crosswise model.
    Hoffmann A; Meisters J; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258603. PubMed ID: 34714838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metabolic state as a modulator of neural event-related potentials for food stimuli in an implicit association test.
    Lahtinen A; Juvonen K; Lapveteläinen A; Kolehmainen M; Lindholm M; Tanila H; Kantanen T; Sinikallio S; Karhunen L; Närväinen J
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Oct; 209():112589. PubMed ID: 31252028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.