These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26074798)

  • 21. Does multidimensional forced-choice prevent faking? Comparing the susceptibility of the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format to faking.
    Wetzel E; Frick S; Brown A
    Psychol Assess; 2021 Feb; 33(2):156-170. PubMed ID: 33151727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Controlling social desirability may attenuate faking effects: a study with aggression measures.
    Anguiano-Carrasco C; Vigil-Colet A; Ferrando PJ
    Psicothema; 2013; 25(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 23628529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implicit attitudes towards risky driving behaviors: Evidence of validity for the implicit association test.
    Tosi JD; Ledesma RD; Díaz Lázaro CM; Poó FM
    J Safety Res; 2020 Dec; 75():284-291. PubMed ID: 33334487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using response-time latencies to measure athletes' doping attitudes: the brief implicit attitude test identifies substance abuse in bodybuilders.
    Brand R; Wolff W; Thieme D
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2014 Sep; 9():36. PubMed ID: 25209168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The relation between race-related implicit associations and scalp-recorded neural activity evoked by faces from different races.
    He Y; Johnson MK; Dovidio JF; McCarthy G
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(5):426-42. PubMed ID: 19562628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.
    McFarland LA; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Oct; 85(5):812-21. PubMed ID: 11055152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.
    Sjöberg L
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 26043667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identifying temporal and causal contributions of neural processes underlying the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Forbes CE; Cameron KA; Grafman J; Barbey A; Solomon J; Ritter W; Ruchkin DS
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():320. PubMed ID: 23226123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Early Neural Markers of Implicit Attitudes: N170 Modulated by Intergroup and Evaluative Contexts in IAT.
    Ibáñez A; Gleichgerrcht E; Hurtado E; González R; Haye A; Manes FF
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2010; 4():188. PubMed ID: 21079750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting instructed simulation and dissimulation when screening for depressive symptoms.
    Goerigk S; Hilbert S; Jobst A; Falkai P; Bühner M; Stachl C; Bischl B; Coors S; Ehring T; Padberg F; Sarubin N
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 270(2):153-168. PubMed ID: 30542818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The intention to conceal activates the right prefrontal cortex: an event-related potential study.
    Matsuda I; Nittono H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Mar; 26(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 25646583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conflict monitoring and stimulus categorization processes involved in the prosocial attitude implicit association test: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Xiao F; Zheng Z; Wang Y; Cui J; Chen Y
    Soc Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 10(4):408-17. PubMed ID: 25623088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Psychometric Costs of Applicants' Faking: Examining Measurement Invariance and Retest Correlations Across Response Conditions.
    Krammer G; Sommer M; Arendasy ME
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(5):510-523. PubMed ID: 28300431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual differences in faking integrity tests.
    Brown RD; Cothern CM
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):691-702. PubMed ID: 12530710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deceptiveness on the PAI: a study of naïve faking with psychiatric inpatients.
    Baity MR; Siefert CJ; Chambers A; Blais MA
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Feb; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17266410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contextual blending of ingroup/outgroup face stimuli and word valence: LPP modulation and convergence of measures.
    Hurtado E; Haye A; González R; Manes F; Ibáñez A
    BMC Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 10():69. PubMed ID: 19558689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Brief Death Implicit Association Test: Scoring recommendations, reliability, validity, and comparisons with the Death Implicit Association Test.
    Millner AJ; Coppersmith DDL; Teachman BA; Nock MK
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Oct; 30(10):1356-1366. PubMed ID: 29781668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pointing fingers at others: The neural correlates of actor-observer asymmetry in blame attribution.
    Chen C; Martínez RM; Chen Y; Cheng Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Jan; 136():107281. PubMed ID: 31770551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the controllability of evaluative-priming effects: some limits that are none.
    Teige-Mocigemba S; Klauer KC
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(4):632-57. PubMed ID: 23075050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Manipulating item proportion and deception reveals crucial dissociation between behavioral, autonomic, and neural indices of concealed information.
    Suchotzki K; Verschuere B; Peth J; Crombez G; Gamer M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Feb; 36(2):427-39. PubMed ID: 25277495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.