These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26075662)

  • 1. Implications of Removing Random Guessing from Rasch Item Estimates in Vertical Scaling.
    Marais I
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(2):113-28. PubMed ID: 26075662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Controlling Guessing Bias in the Dichotomous Rasch Model Applied to a Large-Scale, Vertically Scaled Testing Program.
    Andrich D; Marais I; Humphry SM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 76(3):412-435. PubMed ID: 29795871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using a Rasch Model to Account for Guessing as a Source of Low Discrimination.
    Humphry S
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 26075667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lucky Guess? Applying Rasch Measurement Theory to Grade 5 South African Mathematics Achievement Data.
    Bansilal S; Long C; Juan A
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(2):206-220. PubMed ID: 31120436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Apr; 70(4):378-86. PubMed ID: 16595530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective implementation of correction for guessing in oral and maxillofacial pathology multiple-choice examinations: did student performance improve?
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Littlefield JH; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1149-59. PubMed ID: 18923095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Interaction of Ability Differences and Guessing When Modeling Differential Item Functioning With the Rasch Model: Conventional and Tailored Calibration.
    DeMars CE; Jurich DP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Aug; 75(4):610-633. PubMed ID: 29795835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rasch techniques for detecting bias in performance assessments: an example comparing the performance of native and non-native speakers on a test of academic English.
    Elder C; McNamara T; Congdon P
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 12748409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18230093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractors with information in multiple choice items: a rationale based on the Rasch model.
    Andrich D; Styles I
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 21512214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical item analysis of the examination in anesthesiology for medical students using the Rasch model.
    Yang SC; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang KY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2011 Mar; 74(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 21421207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of rasch measurement to a measure of musical performance.
    Haley KA
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(3):266-77. PubMed ID: 10431493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model.
    Lange R
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):81-104. PubMed ID: 18180552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rasch simultaneous vertical equating for measuring reading growth.
    Lee OK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 12700428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between robust z and 0.3-Logit Difference procedures in assessing stability of linking items for the Rasch model.
    Huynh H; Rawls A
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 22089507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Penalties in multiple-choice and true-false questions.
    Koeslag JH; Melzer CW; Schach SR
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Jan; 63(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 6849146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.