These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26075668)

  • 1. Chi-Squared Test of Fit and Sample Size-A Comparison between a Random Sample Approach and a Chi-Square Value Adjustment Method.
    Bergh D
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(2):204-17. PubMed ID: 26075668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.
    Hagell P; Westergren A
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):416-431. PubMed ID: 28009589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
    Corty EW; Corty RW
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test for autoregressive logistic regression models with applications to patient screening.
    Hansen AM; Jeske D; Kirsch W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 24854578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics.
    Yuan KH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2005 Jan; 40(1):115-48. PubMed ID: 26822275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations.
    Campbell I
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3661-75. PubMed ID: 17315184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.
    Heene M; Hilbert S; Draxler C; Ziegler M; Bühner M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):319-36. PubMed ID: 21843002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment on homogeneity tests for kappa statistics under equal prevalence across studies in reliability.
    Nam JM
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1521-31. PubMed ID: 16220477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of statistical selection strategies for univariate and bivariate log-linear models.
    Moses T; Holland PW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):557-74. PubMed ID: 20030964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation.
    Curran PJ; Bollen KA; Paxton P; Kirby J; Chen F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Jan; 37(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 26824167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the Bootstrap Method to Evaluate the Critical Range of Misfit for Polytomous Rasch Fit Statistics.
    Seol H
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Jun; 118(3):937-56. PubMed ID: 27207735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Goodness of fit in polytomous items: Type I error rates and empirical power for three fit-indexes].
    Sueiro MJ; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2009 Nov; 21(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 19861112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comments on 'Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations'.
    Martín Andrés A
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1791-5; author reply 1795-6. PubMed ID: 18069725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
    Smith RM; Plackner C
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 19934529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the distribution of the unpaired t-statistic with paired data.
    Proschan MA
    Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):1059-63. PubMed ID: 8783442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infit and Outfit: Interpreting Statistical Significance and Magnitude of Misfit in Conjunction.
    DeMars CE
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(2):163-177. PubMed ID: 28961152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multivariate two-sample mean test for small sample size and missing data.
    Wu Y; Genton MG; Stefanski LA
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):877-85. PubMed ID: 16984331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of tests of contingency tables.
    Amiri S; Modarres R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):784-796. PubMed ID: 27936354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.