These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26075668)

  • 21. Small-sample adjustments in using the sandwich variance estimator in generalized estimating equations.
    Pan W; Wall MM
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1429-41. PubMed ID: 12185894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Beta risk: an unrecognized risk of statistical error].
    Jenny JY
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 11319429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A general goodness-of-fit approach for inference procedures concerning the kappa statistic.
    Altaye M; Donner A; Eliasziw M
    Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(16):2479-88. PubMed ID: 11512137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating the goodness of fit in models of sparse medical data: a simulation approach.
    Boyle P; Flowerdew R; Williams A
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 26(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 9222792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Global goodness-of-fit tests in logistic regression with sparse data.
    Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3789-801. PubMed ID: 12483767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MRI-based clinical trials in relapsing-remitting MS: new sample size calculations based on a longitudinal model.
    Altman RM; Petkau AJ; Vrecko D; Smith A
    Mult Scler; 2012 Nov; 18(11):1600-8. PubMed ID: 22495948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Normalization methods for analysis of microarray gene-expression data.
    Chen YJ; Kodell R; Sistare F; Thompson KL; Morris S; Chen JJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 12635903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparability of item quality indices from sparse data matrices with random and non-random missing data patterns.
    Wolfe EW; McGill MT
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 22357157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reading a research article part II: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
    Oliver D; Mahon SM
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2005 Apr; 9(2):238-40. PubMed ID: 15853166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Power of tests for comparing trend curves with application to national immunization survey (NIS).
    Zhao Z
    Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(5):531-40. PubMed ID: 21287587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sample size estimation in single-arm clinical trials with multiple testing under frequentist and Bayesian approaches.
    Zaslavsky BG; Scott J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):819-35. PubMed ID: 22651117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Power for studies with random group sizes.
    Ambrosius WT; Mahnken JD
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(10):1137-44. PubMed ID: 20222151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The size of the chi-square test for the Hardy-Weinberg law.
    Kang SH; Shin D
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 15604560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conditional and Unconditional Tests (and Sample Size) Based on Multiple Comparisons for Stratified 2 × 2 Tables.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I; Álvarez Hernández M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():147038. PubMed ID: 26075012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When should one adjust for measurement error in baseline variables in observational studies?
    Walter SD; Forbes A; Chan S; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 21259307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A small p-value from an observed data is not evidence of adequate power for future similar-sized studies: a cautionary note.
    Atenafu EG; Hamid JS; Stephens D; To T; Beyene J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Mar; 30(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 19063996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating Equivalence Testing Methods for Measurement Invariance.
    Counsell A; Cribbie RA; Flora DB
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):312-328. PubMed ID: 31389729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multiplicity-adjusted sample size requirements: a strategy to maintain statistical power with Bonferroni adjustments.
    Leon AC
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2004 Nov; 65(11):1511-4. PubMed ID: 15554764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.