BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26075791)

  • 1. A method to predict the impact of regulatory variants from DNA sequence.
    Lee D; Gorkin DU; Baker M; Strober BJ; Asoni AL; McCallion AS; Beer MA
    Nat Genet; 2015 Aug; 47(8):955-61. PubMed ID: 26075791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting enhancer activity and variant impact using gkm-SVM.
    Beer MA
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1251-1258. PubMed ID: 28120510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Convolutional neural network model to predict causal risk factors that share complex regulatory features.
    Lee T; Sung MK; Lee S; Yang W; Oh J; Kim JY; Hwang S; Ban HJ; Choi JK
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Dec; 47(22):e146. PubMed ID: 31598692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying deleterious effects of regulatory variants.
    Li S; Alvarez RV; Sharan R; Landsman D; Ovcharenko I
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Mar; 45(5):2307-2317. PubMed ID: 27980060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrative Genomic Analysis Predicts Causative
    Zhang Y; Manjunath M; Zhang S; Chasman D; Roy S; Song JS
    Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 78(7):1579-1591. PubMed ID: 29351903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mining the Unknown: Assigning Function to Noncoding Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.
    Nishizaki SS; Boyle AP
    Trends Genet; 2017 Jan; 33(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 27939749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GERV: a statistical method for generative evaluation of regulatory variants for transcription factor binding.
    Zeng H; Hashimoto T; Kang DD; Gifford DK
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 26476779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. TAGOOS: genome-wide supervised learning of non-coding loci associated to complex phenotypes.
    González A; Artufel M; Rihet P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Aug; 47(14):e79. PubMed ID: 31045203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Challenges and progress in interpretation of non-coding genetic variants associated with human disease.
    Zhu Y; Tazearslan C; Suh Y
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2017 Jul; 242(13):1325-1334. PubMed ID: 28581336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limited statistical evidence for shared genetic effects of eQTLs and autoimmune-disease-associated loci in three major immune-cell types.
    Chun S; Casparino A; Patsopoulos NA; Croteau-Chonka DC; Raby BA; De Jager PL; Sunyaev SR; Cotsapas C
    Nat Genet; 2017 Apr; 49(4):600-605. PubMed ID: 28218759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expression of long non-coding RNAs in autoimmunity and linkage to enhancer function and autoimmune disease risk genetic variants.
    Aune TM; Crooke PS; Patrick AE; Tossberg JT; Olsen NJ; Spurlock CF
    J Autoimmun; 2017 Jul; 81():99-109. PubMed ID: 28420548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating regulatory features data for prediction of functional disease-associated SNPs.
    Dong SS; Guo Y; Yao S; Chen YX; He MN; Zhang YJ; Chen XF; Chen JB; Yang TL
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jan; 20(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28968709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for functional transcriptional and splicing regulatory variants with GenIE.
    Cooper SE; Schwartzentruber J; Bello E; Coomber EL; Bassett AR
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Dec; 48(22):e131. PubMed ID: 33152068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate eQTL prioritization with an ensemble-based framework.
    Zeng H; Edwards MD; Guo Y; Gifford DK
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1259-1265. PubMed ID: 28224684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of different negative training data on regulatory sequence predictions.
    Krützfeldt LM; Schubach M; Kircher M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0237412. PubMed ID: 33259518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic identification of regulatory variants associated with cancer risk.
    Liu S; Liu Y; Zhang Q; Wu J; Liang J; Yu S; Wei GH; White KP; Wang X
    Genome Biol; 2017 Oct; 18(1):194. PubMed ID: 29061142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Running spell-check to identify regulatory variants.
    Kircher M; Shendure J
    Nat Genet; 2015 Aug; 47(8):853-5. PubMed ID: 26220134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic associations of breast and prostate cancer are enriched for regulatory elements identified in disease-related tissues.
    Chen H; Kichaev G; Bien SA; MacDonald JW; Wang L; Bammler TK; Auer P; Pasaniuc B; Lindström S
    Hum Genet; 2019 Oct; 138(10):1091-1104. PubMed ID: 31230194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regulatory genomic regions active in immune cell types explain a large proportion of the genetic risk of multiple sclerosis.
    Elangovan RI; Disanto G; Berlanga-Taylor AJ; Ramagopalan SV; Handunnetthi L
    J Hum Genet; 2014 Apr; 59(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 24522295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multi-locus test conditional on confirmed effects leads to increased power in genome-wide association studies.
    Ma L; Han S; Yang J; Da Y
    PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e15006. PubMed ID: 21103364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.