461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26075931)
1. A Randomized Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomies: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy.
Song T; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Seong SJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 26075931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.
Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomies: laparoscopic hysterectomy with some vaginal component versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Kim TJ; Song T; Choi CH; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Apr; 24(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 24568539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Long CY; Fang JH; Chen WC; Su JH; Hsu SC
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002; 53(4):214-9. PubMed ID: 12186986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case-matched study.
Yang YS; Kim SY; Hur MH; Oh KY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):624-31. PubMed ID: 24462594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Shin JW; Lee HH; Lee SP; Park CY
JSLS; 2011; 15(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 21902979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri between 280 and 700 g: a randomized controlled trial.
Mohammed WE; Salama F; Tharwat A; Mohamed I; ElMaraghy A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 296(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 28508344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy with total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Kim DH; Bae DH; Hur M; Kim SH
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1998 Aug; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 9668147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for benign or pre-invasive uterine disease.
Park JY; Nho J; Cho IJ; Park Y; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Nam JH
Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):890-7. PubMed ID: 25106721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Bergamini V; Uccella S; Beretta P; Franchi M; Bolis P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 16527713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total laparoscopy hysterectomy (TLH) in women with benign disease of uterus--a prospective randomized study].
Drahonovský J; Pán M; Baresová S; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
Ceska Gynekol; 2006 Dec; 71(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 17236400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial (LAVA).
Eggemann H; Ignatov A; Frauchiger-Heuer H; Amse T; Costa SD
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):479-485. PubMed ID: 29302807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomised study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of benign diseases of the uterus.
Roy KK; Goyal M; Singla S; Sharma JB; Malhotra N; Kumar S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Oct; 284(4):907-12. PubMed ID: 21140160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gasless single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri weighing 500g or more.
Takeda A; Hayashi S; Imoto S; Nakamura H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():239-44. PubMed ID: 27352286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparovaginal hysterectomy: a decade of evolution.
Cook JR; O'Shea RT; Seman EI
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 44(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 15089833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Yoon BS; Seong SJ; Kim IH; Song T; Kim ML; Kim MK
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):486-9. PubMed ID: 25510688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus: operative outcomes and the learning curve.
Dolanbay M; Kutuk MS; Ozgun MT; Uludag S; Sahin Y
Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 27304647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].
Kovachev S; Ganovska A; Stankova T
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():4-10. PubMed ID: 27514161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)--a comparison between vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy with reference to intra- and postoperative quality parameters].
Bojahr B; Römer T; Lober R; Straube W
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(11):585-91. PubMed ID: 8533492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
