167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26077521)
1. Association of caesarean section and neonatal death: a population-based case-control study in Islamic Republic of Iran.
Ghaedmohammadi Z; Anaraki A; Khajeian A; Khajehian M; Ostovar A
East Mediterr Health J; 2015 Jun; 21(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 26077521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The changing temporal association between caesarean birth and neonatal death in Ethiopia: secondary analysis of nationally representative surveys.
Yisma E; Mol BW; Lynch JW; Smithers LG
BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e027235. PubMed ID: 31615793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adverse infant outcomes associated with caesarean section delivery in India.
Gondwe T; Betha K; Kusneniwar GN; Bunker CH; Tang G; Simhan H; Haggerty CL
Int Health; 2020 Sep; 12(5):411-416. PubMed ID: 31819983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of maternal height on caesarean section and neonatal mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa: An analysis of 34 national datasets.
Arendt E; Singh NS; Campbell OMR
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192167. PubMed ID: 29408912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of mode of delivery on neonatal mortality in very low birthweight infants born in Victoria, Australia: Caesarean section is associated with increased survival in breech-presenting, but not vertex-presenting, infants.
Jonas HA; Lumley JM
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 1997 Apr; 11(2):181-99. PubMed ID: 9131710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mode and timing of twin delivery and perinatal outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis of the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.
Ganchimeg T; Morisaki N; Vogel JP; Cecatti JG; Barrett J; Jayaratne K; Mittal S; Ortiz-Panozo E; Souza JP; Crowther C; Ota E; Mori R;
BJOG; 2014 Mar; 121 Suppl 1():89-100. PubMed ID: 24641539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.
Bernardes TP; Broekhuijsen K; Koopmans CM; Boers KE; van Wyk L; Tajik P; van Pampus MG; Scherjon SA; Mol BW; Franssen MT; van den Berg PP; Groen H
BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1501-8. PubMed ID: 27173131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study.
Karlström A; Lindgren H; Hildingsson I
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):479-86; discussion 486. PubMed ID: 23316937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apgar score and perinatal death after one previous caesarean delivery.
Carlsson Wallin M; Ekström P; Marsál K; Källén K
BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1088-97. PubMed ID: 20497412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
Patel RR; Peters TJ; Murphy DJ;
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determinants of caesarean birth on maternal demand in the Islamic Republic of Iran: a review.
Darsareh F; Aghamolaei T; Rajaei M; Madani A
East Mediterr Health J; 2017 Aug; 23(6):441-448. PubMed ID: 28836657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial.
Glavind J; Kindberg SF; Uldbjerg N; Khalil M; Møller AM; Mortensen BB; Rasmussen OB; Christensen JT; Jørgensen JS; Henriksen TB
BJOG; 2013 Aug; 120(9):1123-32. PubMed ID: 23682628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Caesarean section in the Islamic Republic of Iran: prevalence and some sociodemographic correlates.
Ahmad-Nia S; Delavar B; Eini-Zinab H; Kazemipour S; Mehryar AH; Naghavi M
East Mediterr Health J; 2009; 15(6):1389-98. PubMed ID: 20218129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for term breech delivery].
Babović I; Plesiinac S; Radojicić Z; Opalić J; Argirović R; Mladenović-Bogdanović Z; Plećas D
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Oct; 67(10):807-11. PubMed ID: 21066872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maternal near-miss at university hospitals with cesarean overuse: an incident case-control study.
Mohammadi S; Essén B; Fallahian M; Taheripanah R; Saleh Gargari S; Källestål C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Jul; 95(7):777-86. PubMed ID: 26918866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between Caesarean section and neonatal mortality in very-low-birthweight infants born in Washington State, USA.
Jonas HA; Khalid N; Schwartz SM
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 1999 Apr; 13(2):170-89. PubMed ID: 10214608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705 singleton term breech presentations.
Irion O; Hirsbrunner Almagbaly P; Morabia A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Jul; 105(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 9692410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Breech delivery and scarred uterus: a special obstetrical situation?].
Bourtembourg A; Mangin M; Ramanah R; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Jun; 42(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 23453918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
