These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26077712)

  • 1. Accurately modeling nanosecond protein dynamics requires at least microseconds of simulation.
    Bowman GR
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Mar; 37(6):558-66. PubMed ID: 26077712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microsecond simulations of mdm2 and its complex with p53 yield insight into force field accuracy and conformational dynamics.
    Pantelopulos GA; Mukherjee S; Voelz VA
    Proteins; 2015 Sep; 83(9):1665-76. PubMed ID: 26138282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function.
    Klepeis JL; Lindorff-Larsen K; Dror RO; Shaw DE
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2009 Apr; 19(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 19361980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motions and entropies in proteins as seen in NMR relaxation experiments and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Allnér O; Foloppe N; Nilsson L
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):1114-28. PubMed ID: 25350574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scrutinizing molecular mechanics force fields on the submicrosecond timescale with NMR data.
    Lange OF; van der Spoel D; de Groot BL
    Biophys J; 2010 Jul; 99(2):647-55. PubMed ID: 20643085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaching biological timescales with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
    Zwier MC; Chong LT
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 10(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 20934381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of the structural ensembles of p53 TAD2 by molecular dynamics simulations with different force fields.
    Ouyang Y; Zhao L; Zhang Z
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 20(13):8676-8684. PubMed ID: 29537020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Importance of long-time simulations for rare event sampling in zinc finger proteins.
    Godwin R; Gmeiner W; Salsbury FR
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2016; 34(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 25734227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and precision of NMR relaxation experiments and MD simulations for characterizing protein dynamics.
    Philippopoulos M; Mandel AM; Palmer AG; Lim C
    Proteins; 1997 Aug; 28(4):481-93. PubMed ID: 9261865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
    Raval A; Piana S; Eastwood MP; Dror RO; Shaw DE
    Proteins; 2012 Aug; 80(8):2071-9. PubMed ID: 22513870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic disorder can explain non-exponential kinetics of fast protein mechanical unfolding.
    Costescu BI; Sturm S; Gräter F
    J Struct Biol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 27771331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly.
    Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the utility of contact-based restraints in accelerating the prediction of protein structure using molecular dynamics simulations.
    Raval A; Piana S; Eastwood MP; Shaw DE
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 26266489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Force field dependence of phospholipid headgroup and acyl chain properties: comparative molecular dynamics simulations of DMPC bilayers.
    Prakash P; Sankararamakrishnan R
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Jan; 31(2):266-77. PubMed ID: 19475632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the accuracy of physical models used in protein-folding simulations: quantitative evidence from long molecular dynamics simulations.
    Piana S; Klepeis JL; Shaw DE
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2014 Feb; 24():98-105. PubMed ID: 24463371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular simulation of multistate peptide dynamics: a comparison between microsecond timescale sampling and multiple shorter trajectories.
    Monticelli L; Sorin EJ; Tieleman DP; Pande VS; Colombo G
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Aug; 29(11):1740-52. PubMed ID: 18307167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative Assessment of the Conformational Heterogeneity in Amylose across Force Fields.
    Koneru JK; Zhu X; Mondal J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Nov; 15(11):6203-6212. PubMed ID: 31560849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conformational sampling by NMR solution structures calculated with the program DIANA evaluated by comparison with long-time molecular dynamics calculations in explicit water.
    Berndt KD; Güntert P; Wüthrich K
    Proteins; 1996 Mar; 24(3):304-13. PubMed ID: 8778777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atomistic Force Fields for Proteins.
    Best RB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():3-19. PubMed ID: 31396897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hybrid approaches to molecular simulation.
    Ho BK; Perahia D; Buckle AM
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2012 Jun; 22(3):386-93. PubMed ID: 22633678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.