These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26077712)

  • 21. Population shuffling of protein conformations.
    Smith CA; Ban D; Pratihar S; Giller K; Schwiegk C; de Groot BL; Becker S; Griesinger C; Lee D
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2015 Jan; 54(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 25377083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Demonstrating an Order-of-Magnitude Sampling Enhancement in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Complex Protein Systems.
    Pan AC; Weinreich TM; Piana S; Shaw DE
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Mar; 12(3):1360-7. PubMed ID: 26866996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Coupled two-dimensional main-chain torsional potential for protein dynamics II: performance and validation.
    Gao Y; Li Y; Mou L; Hu W; Zheng J; Zhang JZ; Mei Y
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Mar; 119(11):4188-93. PubMed ID: 25719206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simulating the peptide folding kinetic related spectra based on the Markov State Model.
    Song J; Zhuang W
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 805():199-220. PubMed ID: 24446363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nanosecond motions in proteins impose bounds on the timescale distributions of local dynamics.
    Okan OB; Atilgan AR; Atilgan C
    Biophys J; 2009 Oct; 97(7):2080-8. PubMed ID: 19804740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-throughput molecular dynamics: the powerful new tool for drug discovery.
    Harvey MJ; De Fabritiis G
    Drug Discov Today; 2012 Oct; 17(19-20):1059-62. PubMed ID: 22504137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Application of Markov State Models to simulate long timescale dynamics of biological macromolecules.
    Da LT; Sheong FK; Silva DA; Huang X
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 805():29-66. PubMed ID: 24446356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Motional timescale predictions by molecular dynamics simulations: case study using proline and hydroxyproline sidechain dynamics.
    Aliev AE; Kulke M; Khaneja HS; Chudasama V; Sheppard TD; Lanigan RM
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 23818175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biomolecules Using NMR Spin Relaxation as Benchmarks:  Application to the AMBER99SB Force Field.
    Showalter SA; Brüschweiler R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2007 May; 3(3):961-75. PubMed ID: 26627416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of current all-atom force-fields in modeling protein disordered states.
    Palazzesi F; Prakash MK; Bonomi M; Barducci A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jan; 11(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 26574197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nonequilibrium, multiple-timescale simulations of ligand-receptor interactions in structured protein systems.
    Zhang Y; Peters MH; Li Y
    Proteins; 2003 Aug; 52(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 12866048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Principal Component Analysis of Lipid Molecule Conformational Changes in Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Buslaev P; Gordeliy V; Grudinin S; Gushchin I
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Mar; 12(3):1019-28. PubMed ID: 26765212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Membrane Protein Simulations Using AMBER Force Field and Berger Lipid Parameters.
    Cordomí A; Caltabiano G; Pardo L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Mar; 8(3):948-58. PubMed ID: 26593357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Communication: Multiple atomistic force fields in a single enhanced sampling simulation.
    Hoang Viet M; Derreumaux P; Nguyen PH
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Jul; 143(2):021101. PubMed ID: 26178083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frontiers in molecular dynamics simulations of DNA.
    Pérez A; Luque FJ; Orozco M
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Feb; 45(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 21830782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing molecular dynamics force fields in the essential subspace.
    Martín-García F; Papaleo E; Gomez-Puertas P; Boomsma W; Lindorff-Larsen K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121114. PubMed ID: 25811178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microsecond molecular dynamics simulation shows effect of slow loop dynamics on backbone amide order parameters of proteins.
    Maragakis P; Lindorff-Larsen K; Eastwood MP; Dror RO; Klepeis JL; Arkin IT; Jensen MØ; Xu H; Trbovic N; Friesner RA; Palmer AG; Shaw DE
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 May; 112(19):6155-8. PubMed ID: 18311962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Equilibration of experimentally determined protein structures for molecular dynamics simulation.
    Walton EB; Vanvliet KJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Dec; 74(6 Pt 1):061901. PubMed ID: 17280090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How consistent are molecular dynamics simulations? Comparing structure and dynamics in reduced and oxidized Escherichia coli thioredoxin.
    Elofsson A; Nilsson L
    J Mol Biol; 1993 Oct; 233(4):766-80. PubMed ID: 8411178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Starting-Condition Dependence of Order Parameters Derived from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Genheden S; Diehl C; Akke M; Ryde U
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2176-90. PubMed ID: 26615944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.