760 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26078202)
1. Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Boxler S; Kuru TH; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Steinemann S; Huettenbrink C; Bergstraesser-Gasch C; Klein T; Kesch C; Roethke M; Becker N; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2015 Sep; 18(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26078202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Bonekamp D; Freitag MT; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Hatiboglu G; Boxler S; Pahernik S; Roth W; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Sep; 19(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 27184812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management: a systematic review.
Monni F; Fontanella P; Grasso A; Wiklund P; Ou YC; Randazzo M; Rocco B; Montanari E; Bianchi G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 28488844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer Using Target Saturation in Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography-fusion Biopsy.
Tschirdewahn S; Wiesenfarth M; Bonekamp D; Püllen L; Reis H; Panic A; Kesch C; Darr C; Heß J; Giganti F; Moore CM; Guberina N; Forsting M; Wetter A; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1300-1307. PubMed ID: 32660838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Washino S; Kobayashi S; Okochi T; Kameda T; Konoshi T; Miyagawa T; Takayama T; Morita T
BMC Urol; 2018 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29843694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Multiparametric MRI and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsy].
Kesch C; Radtke JP; Distler F; Boxler S; Klein T; Hüttenbrink C; Hees K; Roth W; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Urologe A; 2016 Aug; 55(8):1071-7. PubMed ID: 27168038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?
Salami SS; Ben-Levi E; Yaskiv O; Ryniker L; Turkbey B; Kavoussi LR; Villani R; Rastinehad AR
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 25252133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Pennisi M
Anticancer Res; 2017 Jun; 37(6):3291-3294. PubMed ID: 28551679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A predictive model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters for improved risk assessment and selection of biopsy-naïve men for prostate biopsies.
Boesen L; Thomsen FB; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thomsen HS; Jakobsen H
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 30988407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bi- or multiparametric MRI in a sequential screening program for prostate cancer with PSA followed by MRI? Results from the Göteborg prostate cancer screening 2 trial.
Wallström J; Geterud K; Kohestani K; Maier SE; Månsson M; Pihl CG; Socratous A; Arnsrud Godtman R; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8692-8702. PubMed ID: 33890152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.
Piert M; Montgomery J; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Rogers V; Rajendiran T; Johnson TD; Shao X; Davenport MS
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1065-70. PubMed ID: 26985061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Value of Guided Biopsies: Fusion and Cognitive-registration Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Conventional Ultrasound Biopsy of the Prostate.
Oberlin DT; Casalino DD; Miller FH; Matulewicz RS; Perry KT; Nadler RB; Kundu S; Catalona WJ; Meeks JJ
Urology; 2016 Jun; 92():75-9. PubMed ID: 26966043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
