151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26078995)
1. Perioperative Outcomes in Orthopedic Surgery.
Memtsoudis SG; Vougioukas VI; Stundner O; Poultsides LA
ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():648284. PubMed ID: 26078995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Complication management with minimally invasive spine procedures.
Hussain NS; Perez-Cruet MJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Oct; 31(4):E2. PubMed ID: 21961864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis.
Anand N; Rosemann R; Khalsa B; Baron EM
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Mar; 28(3):E6. PubMed ID: 20192666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spine surgeon specialty is not a risk factor for 30-day complication rates in single-level lumbar fusion: a propensity score-matched study of 2528 patients.
Kim BD; Edelstein AI; Hsu WK; Lim S; Kim JY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jul; 39(15):E919-27. PubMed ID: 24827522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of growing rod technique for pediatric congenital spinal deformities.
Elsebai HB; Yazici M; Thompson GH; Emans JB; Skaggs DL; Crawford AH; Karlin LI; McCarthy RE; Poe-Kochert C; Kostial P; Akbarnia BA
J Pediatr Orthop; 2011; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21150722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infection rate after minimally invasive noninstrumented spinal surgery based on 4350 procedures.
Shousha M; Cirovic D; Boehm H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 25668336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perioperative surgical complications and learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institute experience.
Park Y; Lee SB; Seok SO; Jo BW; Ha JW
Clin Orthop Surg; 2015 Mar; 7(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 25729524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advances in technology and surgical technique in spine surgery.
Verma R; Siddiqi F; Lipetz JS; Samujh C; Silber JS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Aug; 36(8):413-7. PubMed ID: 17849026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathophysiology of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches: Current Concepts.
Siemionow K; Tyrakowski M; Janusz P; Maciejczak A
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2016 Jul; 77(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 26291888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous pedicle screws significantly decrease muscle damage and operative time: surgical technique makes a difference!
Dickerman RD; Reynolds AS; Tackett J; Winters K; Alvarado C
Eur Spine J; 2008 Oct; 17(10):1398; author reply 1399-400. PubMed ID: 18615258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis.
Lau D; Terman SW; Patel R; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 23394166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: a study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Schoenfeld AJ; Ochoa LM; Bader JO; Belmont PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(17):1577-82. PubMed ID: 21915571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of blood transfusion on short-term, perioperative outcomes in elective spine surgery.
Seicean A; Alan N; Seicean S; Neuhauser D; Weil RJ
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1579-85. PubMed ID: 24852902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine trauma.
Koreckij T; Park DK; Fischgrund J
Neurosurg Focus; 2014; 37(1):E11. PubMed ID: 24981899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity.
Moller DJ; Slimack NP; Acosta FL; Koski TR; Fessler RG; Liu JC
Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Oct; 31(4):E4. PubMed ID: 21961867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Editorial comment: Minimally invasive spine surgery.
Nassr A; Currier BL; Garfin SR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1709-10. PubMed ID: 24711133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of complication rate between anterior and lateral approaches to the lumbar spine.
Hrabalek L; Adamus M; Gryga A; Wanek T; Tucek P
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2014; 158(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 23073535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy and Safety of Posterior Versus Combined Posterior and Anterior Approach for the Treatment of Spinal Tuberculosis: A Meta-Analysis.
Liu J; Wan L; Long X; Huang S; Dai M; Liu Z
World Neurosurg; 2015 Jun; 83(6):1157-65. PubMed ID: 25698521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]