These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. The diabetic foot: managing infection using Cutimed Sorbact dressings. Skinner R; Hampton S Br J Nurs; 2010 Jun 10-23; 19(11):S30, S32-6. PubMed ID: 20677385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of honey and sugar dressings on wound healing. Mphande AN; Killowe C; Phalira S; Jones HW; Harrison WJ J Wound Care; 2007 Jul; 16(7):317-9. PubMed ID: 17708384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of semiocclusive, transparent film dressings for surgical wound protection: experience in 3637 cases. Rubio PA Int Surg; 1991; 76(4):253-4. PubMed ID: 1778724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The effect of external infection on surgical wound healing]. Stritof K Acta Chir Iugosl; 1980; 27 Suppl 1():21-5. PubMed ID: 7424373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Does sterile or nonsterile technique make a difference in wounds healing by secondary intention? Lawson C; Juliano L; Ratliff CR Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Apr; 49(4):56-8, 60. PubMed ID: 12732741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mepilex Ag: an antimicrobial, absorbent foam dressing with Safetac technology. Barrett S Br J Nurs; 2009 Nov 12-25; 18(20):S28, S30-6. PubMed ID: 20081669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical evaluation of hydrocolloidal dressing in 147 patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery]. Ogawa M; Tsukui H; Ishii H; Yokoyama S; Koh E Kyobu Geka; 2005 Jul; 58(7):555-8. PubMed ID: 16004337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative study of two antimicrobial dressings in infected leg ulcers: a pilot study. Mosti G; Magliaro A; Mattaliano V; Picerni P; Angelotti N J Wound Care; 2015 Mar; 24(3):121-2; 124-7. PubMed ID: 25764956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Mouës CM; Vos MC; van den Bemd GJ; Stijnen T; Hovius SE Wound Repair Regen; 2004; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 14974959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations. Holm C; Petersen JS; Grønboek F; Gottrup F Eur J Surg; 1998 Mar; 164(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 9562277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Occlusive dressing versus petroleum gauze on drainage wounds. Alsbjörn BF; Ovesen H; Walther-Larsen S Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Mar; 156(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 2336914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preventing disruption of surgical dressings in patients with cognitive impairment. Blattner CM; Markus B; Lear W J Am Acad Dermatol; 2017 May; 76(5):e173-e174. PubMed ID: 28411791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A retrospective study evaluating silver-impregnated dressings on cesarean wound healing. Connery SA; Downes KL; Young C Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Sep; 25(9):414-9. PubMed ID: 22914038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Treatment of an infected venous leg ulcer with honey dressings. Alcaraz A; Kelly J Br J Nurs; 2002 Jul 11-24; 11(13):859-60, 862, 864-6. PubMed ID: 12131839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Effect of dressing materials on wound healing]. Linder R Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1998; 115():694-7. PubMed ID: 9931703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]