These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26079134)

  • 1. Posterior Probability Matching and Human Perceptual Decision Making.
    Murray RF; Patel K; Yee A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 11(6):e1004342. PubMed ID: 26079134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification images reveal decision variables and strategies in forced choice tasks.
    Pritchett LM; Murray RF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(23):7321-6. PubMed ID: 26015584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjects adjust criterion on errors in perceptual decision tasks.
    Killeen PR; Taylor TJ; Treviño M
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):117-130. PubMed ID: 29345482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision-related activity in sensory neurons: correlations among neurons and with behavior.
    Nienborg H; Cohen MR; Cumming BG
    Annu Rev Neurosci; 2012; 35():463-83. PubMed ID: 22483043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. You'd better think twice: post-decision perceptual confidence.
    Hilgenstock R; Weiss T; Witte OW
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():323-31. PubMed ID: 24862076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. There are at least two kinds of probability matching: evidence from a secondary task.
    Otto AR; Taylor EG; Markman AB
    Cognition; 2011 Feb; 118(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 21145046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability matching as a computational strategy used in perception.
    Wozny DR; Beierholm UR; Shams L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 20700493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability matching involves rule-generating ability: a neuropsychological mechanism dealing with probabilities.
    Unturbe J; Corominas J
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Sep; 21(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 17784810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A unified bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades.
    Shimozaki SS; Schoonveld WA; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing the impact of category uncertainty on human auditory categorization behavior.
    Gifford AM; Cohen YE; Stocker AA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Jul; 10(7):e1003715. PubMed ID: 25032683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the ideal observer to predict performance in perceptual tasks: an example from the auditory temporal masking domain.
    MacDonald JA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2639-48. PubMed ID: 22006524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The wisdom of crowds for visual search.
    Juni MZ; Eckstein MP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 May; 114(21):E4306-E4315. PubMed ID: 28490500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
    Burgess AE
    Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for time-variant decision making.
    Ditterich J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(12):3628-41. PubMed ID: 17229111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the growth of internal evidence guiding perceptual decisions.
    Ludwig CJ; Davies JR
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Sep; 63(2):61-92. PubMed ID: 21699877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal detection by human observers: a cutoff reinforcement learning model of categorization decisions under uncertainty.
    Erev I
    Psychol Rev; 1998 Apr; 105(2):280-98. PubMed ID: 9669925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-pressure effects on performance in a base-rate task.
    Goodie AS; Crooks CL
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 14977029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model.
    Baker DH; Meese TS; Georgeson MA
    Spat Vis; 2007; 20(5):397-413. PubMed ID: 17716525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning.
    Gold J; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Nature; 1999 Nov; 402(6758):176-8. PubMed ID: 10647007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Taking the easy way out? Increasing implementation effort reduces probability maximizing under cognitive load.
    Schulze C; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):806-18. PubMed ID: 26884088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.