BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26080339)

  • 1. Variation in Adenoma Detection Rate and the Lifetime Benefits and Cost of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Model.
    Meester RG; Doubeni CA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Jensen CD; van der Meulen MP; Levin TR; Quinn VP; Schottinger JE; Zauber AG; Corley DA; van Ballegooijen M
    JAMA; 2015 Jun; 313(23):2349-58. PubMed ID: 26080339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of adenoma detection on the benefit of faecal testing vs. colonoscopy for colorectal cancer.
    Meester RGS; Doubeni CA; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Corley DA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Dec; 141(11):2359-2367. PubMed ID: 28815573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Meester RGS; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Knudsen AB; Ladabaum U
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 171(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 31546257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association of Physician Adenoma Detection Rates With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.
    Schottinger JE; Jensen CD; Ghai NR; Chubak J; Lee JK; Kamineni A; Halm EA; Sugg-Skinner C; Udaltsova N; Zhao WK; Ziebell RA; Contreras R; Kim EJ; Fireman BH; Quesenberry CP; Corley DA
    JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(21):2114-2122. PubMed ID: 35670788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Greuter MJE; de Klerk CM; Meijer GA; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):544-554. PubMed ID: 28973514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Projecting total costs and health consequences of increasing mt-sDNA utilization for colorectal cancer screening from the payer and integrated delivery network perspectives.
    Hathway JM; Miller-Wilson LA; Jensen IS; Ozbay B; Regan C; Jena AB; Weinstein MC; Parks PD
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):581-592. PubMed ID: 32063100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can colonoscopy remain cost-effective for colorectal cancer screening? The impact of practice patterns and the Will Rogers phenomenon on costs.
    Austin GL; Fennimore B; Ahnen DJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 108(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23208273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.
    Knudsen AB; Hur C; Gazelle GS; Schrag D; McFarland EG; Kuntz KM
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Nov; 157(9):611-20. PubMed ID: 23128861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Pack K; Stenson I; Kirby PL; Patel B; Rutter MD; Veitch AM; Saunders BP; Little M; Gray A; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 May; 26(26):1-156. PubMed ID: 35635015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare resources from discontinuing colonoscopy surveillance subsequent to low-risk adenoma removal: A simulation study using the OncoSim-Colorectal model.
    Steer KJ; Sun Z; Sadowski DC; Yong JHE; Coldman A; Nemecek N; Yang H
    J Med Screen; 2024 Jun; 31(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 37728194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.
    Meester RG; Zauber AG; Doubeni CA; Jensen CD; Quinn VP; Helfand M; Dominitz JA; Levin TR; Corley DA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Oct; 14(10):1445-1451.e8. PubMed ID: 27211498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of screening and follow-up colonoscopy adenoma sensitivity on colorectal cancer screening outcomes in the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.
    Fisher DA; Saoud L; Hassmiller Lich K; Fendrick AM; Ozbay AB; Borah BJ; Matney M; Parton M; Limburg PJ
    Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(8):2855-2864. PubMed ID: 33314646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Rutter CM; Peterse EFP; Lietz AP; Seguin CL; Meester RGS; Perdue LA; Lin JS; Siegel RL; Doria-Rose VP; Feuer EJ; Zauber AG; Kuntz KM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1998-2011. PubMed ID: 34003219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring.
    Kaltenbach T; Gawron A; Meyer CS; Gupta S; Shergill A; Dominitz JA; Soetikno RM; Nguyen-Vu T; A Whooley M; Kahi CJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1883-1889.e1. PubMed ID: 33618027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Evaluation of Critical Factors for the Cost-Effectiveness of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection: Sensitivity and Threshold Analyses Using a Microsimulation Model.
    Thiruvengadam NR; Coté GA; Gupta S; Rodrigues M; Schneider Y; Arain MA; Solaimani P; Serrao S; Kochman ML; Saumoy M
    Gastroenterology; 2023 May; 164(6):906-920. PubMed ID: 36736437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of adenoma detection rate on detection of advanced adenomas and endoscopic adverse events in a study of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies.
    Penz D; Ferlitsch A; Waldmann E; Irina G; Daniel P; Asaturi A; Hinterberger A; Majcher B; Szymanska A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 31499041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer.
    Gini A; Zauber AG; Cenin DR; Omidvari AH; Hempstead SE; Fink AK; Lowenfels AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Feb; 154(3):556-567.e18. PubMed ID: 29102616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
    Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.