These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26080356)

  • 61. A Python tool to set up relative free energy calculations in GROMACS.
    Klimovich PV; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Nov; 29(11):1007-14. PubMed ID: 26487189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Prediction of the binding free energies of new TIBO-like HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors using a combination of PROFEC, PB/SA, CMC/MD, and free energy calculations.
    Eriksson MA; Pitera J; Kollman PA
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):868-81. PubMed ID: 10072684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Molecular insight into pseudolysin inhibition using the MM-PBSA and LIE methods.
    Adekoya OA; Willassen NP; Sylte I
    J Struct Biol; 2006 Feb; 153(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 16376106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Suitability of umbrella- and overlap-sampling methods for calculation of solid-phase free energies by molecular simulation.
    Tan TB; Schultz AJ; Kofke DA
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Jun; 132(21):214103. PubMed ID: 20528014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Free-energy calculations along a high-dimensional fragmented path with constrained dynamics.
    Chen C; Huang Y; Xiao Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Sep; 86(3 Pt 1):031901. PubMed ID: 23030938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Receptor-Ligand Binding Free Energies from a Consecutive Histograms Monte Carlo Sampling Method.
    Liu H; Deng J; Luo Z; Lin Y; Merz KM; Zheng Z
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Oct; 16(10):6645-6655. PubMed ID: 32857938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Enzyme surface rigidity tunes the temperature dependence of catalytic rates.
    Isaksen GV; Åqvist J; Brandsdal BO
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(28):7822-7. PubMed ID: 27354533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Reaction analysis and visualization of ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations.
    Liu J; Li X; Guo L; Zheng M; Han J; Yuan X; Nie F; Liu X
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Sep; 53():13-22. PubMed ID: 25064439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Implementation of the QUBE Force Field in SOMD for High-Throughput Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations.
    Nelson L; Bariami S; Ringrose C; Horton JT; Kurdekar V; Mey ASJS; Michel J; Cole DJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 May; 61(5):2124-2130. PubMed ID: 33886305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Alchemical Free Energy Calculations for Nucleotide Mutations in Protein-DNA Complexes.
    Gapsys V; de Groot BL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):6275-6289. PubMed ID: 29125747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Empirical Valence Bond Simulations of Organophosphate Hydrolysis: Theory and Practice.
    Purg M; Kamerlin SCL
    Methods Enzymol; 2018; 607():3-51. PubMed ID: 30149862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Combining Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Enhanced Binding Free Energy Estimation through Markov State Models.
    Gilabert JF; Gracia Carmona O; Hogner A; Guallar V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5529-5539. PubMed ID: 32644807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations.
    Klimovich PV; Shirts MR; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 May; 29(5):397-411. PubMed ID: 25808134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. gRINN: a tool for calculation of residue interaction energies and protein energy network analysis of molecular dynamics simulations.
    Serçinoglu O; Ozbek P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W554-W562. PubMed ID: 29800260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Ligand binding free-energy calculations with funnel metadynamics.
    Raniolo S; Limongelli V
    Nat Protoc; 2020 Sep; 15(9):2837-2866. PubMed ID: 32814837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Standard Binding Free-Energy Calculations: How Far Are We from Automation?
    Fu H; Chipot C; Shao X; Cai W
    J Phys Chem B; 2023 Dec; 127(49):10459-10468. PubMed ID: 37824848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Drug Discovery by Automated Adaptation of Chemical Structure and Identity.
    Patel LA; Chau P; Debesai S; Darwin L; Neale C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Aug; 18(8):5006-5024. PubMed ID: 35834740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Comparison of thermodynamic integration and Bennett acceptance ratio for calculating relative protein-ligand binding free energies.
    de Ruiter A; Boresch S; Oostenbrink C
    J Comput Chem; 2013 May; 34(12):1024-34. PubMed ID: 23335287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Empirical valence bond calculations of enzyme catalysis.
    Warshel A; Weiss RM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 367():370-82. PubMed ID: 6942759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. On the origin of the catalytic power of carboxypeptidase A and other metalloenzymes.
    Kilshtain AV; Warshel A
    Proteins; 2009 Nov; 77(3):536-50. PubMed ID: 19480013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.