136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26081260)
41. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study.
Khalil A; Syngelaki A; Maiz N; Zinevich Y; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 42(6):634-43. PubMed ID: 23630102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cesarean section in grandmultiparas.
Ali FA; Spiewankiewicz B
Mater Med Pol; 1996; 28(3):87-91. PubMed ID: 9167418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes].
Reis ZS; Lage EM; Aguiar RA; Gaspar Jde S; Vitral GL; Machado EG
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2014 Feb; 36(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 24676014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
Bilar M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Primary cesarean deliveries prior to labor in the United States, 1979-2004.
Joesch JM; Gossman GL; Tanfer K
Matern Child Health J; 2008 May; 12(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 17647096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Pregnancy outcomes after pelvic ring injury.
Vallier HA; Cureton BA; Schubeck D
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 May; 26(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 22048182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Implications of the first cesarean: perinatal and future reproductive health and subsequent cesareans, placentation issues, uterine rupture risk, morbidity, and mortality.
Silver RM
Semin Perinatol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 23009962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Analysis of caesarean delivery in Jimma Hospital, south-western Ethiopia.
Ali Y
East Afr Med J; 1995 Jan; 72(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 7781560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Eighty cases of uterine rupture at the maternity service of the National Hospital Center of Ouagadougou , Burkina Faso].
Lankoandé J; Ouédraogo CM; Touré B; Ouédraogo A; Akotionga M; Sano D; Dao B; Koné B
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(7):715-9. PubMed ID: 9471435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Maternal and fetal mortality and complications associated with cesarean section deliveries in teaching hospitals in Asia.
Chongsuvivatwong V; Bachtiar H; Chowdhury ME; Fernando S; Suwanrath C; Kor-Anantakul O; Tuan le A; Lim A; Lumbiganon P; Manandhar B; Muchtar M; Nahar L; Hieu NT; Fang PX; Prasertcharoensuk W; Radnaabarzar E; Sibuea D; Than KK; Tharnpaisan P; Thach TS; Rowe P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 20178526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Hazard of vaginal delivery after two previous caesarean sections.
Megafu U
Trop J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988; 1(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 12179280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors.
Pallasmaa N; Ekblad U; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Uotila J; Raudaskoski T; Ulander VM; Hurme S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Jul; 89(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 20583935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Trends in caesarean section rates and places of delivery in Burkina Faso].
Sombié I; Clément Méda Z; Léon Savadogo GB; Sanou G; Dadjoari M
Sante Publique; 2017 Mar; 29(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 28737320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cesarean section deliveries in Fiji, 1986 to 1996.
Saunders DL; Makutu SL
Pac Health Dialog; 2001 Mar; 8(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 12017841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Analyzing the impact of private service on the cesarean section rate in public hospital Thailand.
Phadungkiatwattana P; Tongsakul N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1375-9. PubMed ID: 21359844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
