These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

600 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26081595)

  • 1. Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
    Skedgel C; Rayson D; Younis T
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):387-394. PubMed ID: 26081595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia During Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
    Yu JL; Chan K; Kurin M; Pasetka M; Kiss A; Sridhar SS; Warner E
    Breast J; 2015; 21(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26387577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of febrile neutropenia prevention with primary versus secondary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review.
    Younis T; Rayson D; Jovanovic S; Skedgel C
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):425-32. PubMed ID: 27572552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving FEC-D.
    Lee EK; Wong WW; Trudeau ME; Chan KK
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 150(1):169-80. PubMed ID: 25694355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in China].
    Xia W; Wang SS; Hu H; Zhao FL; Xu F; Hong RX; Jiang KK; Yuan ZY; Shi YX; Zhao K; Huang JJ; Xue C; Bi XW; Lu QY; An X; Zhang JM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 42(10):861-867. PubMed ID: 33113628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant FEC-D treatment.
    Assi H; Murray J; Boyle L; Rayson D
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Dec; 22(12):3227-34. PubMed ID: 24996828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant treatment for early node-positive breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    Wolowacz SE; Cameron DA; Tate HC; Bagust A
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Feb; 26(6):925-33. PubMed ID: 18281666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Ramsey SD; Liu Z; Boer R; Sullivan SD; Malin J; Doan QV; Dubois RW; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-centre study comparing granulocyte-colony stimulating factors to antibiotics for primary prophylaxis of docetaxel-cyclophosphamide induced febrile neutropenia.
    Clemons M; Fergusson D; Joy AA; Thavorn K; Meza-Junco J; Hiller JP; Mackey J; Ng T; Zhu X; Ibrahim MFK; Sienkiewicz M; Saunders D; Vandermeer L; Pond G; Basulaiman B; Awan A; Pitre L; Nixon NA; Hutton B; Hilton JF;
    Breast; 2021 Aug; 58():42-49. PubMed ID: 33901921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer in the United Kingdom.
    Whyte S; Cooper KL; Stevenson MD; Madan J; Akehurst R
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):465-74. PubMed ID: 21669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
    Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of colony-stimulating factors to reduce febrile neutropenic events in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.
    Chan A; Fu WH; Shih V; Coyuco JC; Tan SH; Ng R
    Support Care Cancer; 2011 Apr; 19(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 20232087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
    Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The risk of febrile neutropenia and need for G-CSF primary prophylaxis with the docetaxel and cyclophosphamide regimen in early-stage breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
    Do T; Medhekar R; Bhat R; Chen H; Niravath P; Trivedi MV
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 26337685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Parthan A; Walli-Attaei M; Chandler DB; Lyman GH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 24657302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and management of chemotherapy delivery during adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer--further observations from the IMPACT solid study.
    Mäenpää J; Varthalitis I; Erdkamp F; Trojan A; Krzemieniecki K; Lindman H; Bendall K; Vogl FD; Verma S
    Breast; 2016 Feb; 25():27-33. PubMed ID: 26801413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor use and medical costs after initial adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with early-stage breast cancer.
    Griffiths RI; Barron RL; Gleeson ML; Danese MD; O'Hagan A; Chia VM; Legg JC; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Feb; 30(2):103-18. PubMed ID: 21967155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan.
    Ishiguro H; Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Takada M; Nakamura S; Teramukai S; Yanagihara K; Toi M
    Clin Ther; 2010 Feb; 32(2):311-26. PubMed ID: 20206789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.