These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26082913)

  • 1. Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries.
    Park AJ; Choi JH; Kang H; Park KJ; Kim HY; Kim SH; Kim DY; Park SH; Ha YC
    J Bone Metab; 2015 May; 22(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 26082913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom.
    Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10501774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standardization of spine and hip BMD measurements in different DXA devices.
    Ozdemir A; Uçar M
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 17289322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?
    Salzmann SN; Shirahata T; Yang J; Miller CO; Carlson BB; Rentenberger C; Carrino JA; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 30343044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Differences in Bone Mineral Density Measurement With 3 Hologic Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Modes.
    Yu W; Zhang Z; Pan W; Guan W; Lin Q; Xia W; Li T; Hsieh E
    J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(4):645-650. PubMed ID: 33504451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cross-calibration study using a novel dual X-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the European Spine Phantom.
    Jiang Y; Wu Y; Zhang Y; Yang X; Gao J
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2119-2127. PubMed ID: 37064359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender disparity in BMD conversion: a comparison between Lunar and Hologic densitometers.
    Ganda K; Nguyen TV; Pocock N
    Arch Osteoporos; 2014; 9():180. PubMed ID: 25527404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
    Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
    Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo precision of the GE lunar iDXA for the assessment of lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and total body bone mineral density in severely obese patients.
    Carver TE; Christou NV; Court O; Lemke H; Andersen RE
    J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 23896494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study on the scanning protocols for measuring bone mineral density by gemstone CT spectral imaging based on European spine phantom.
    Huang S; Cui X; Han H; Zhang Y; Gao B; Yu W
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Jan; 64(1):346-352. PubMed ID: 34877886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Black hole artifacts-a new potential pitfall for DXA accuracy?
    Morgan SL; Lopez-Ben R; Nunnally N; Burroughs L; Fineberg N; Tubbs RS; Yester MV
    J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 18291695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group.
    Pearson J; Dequeker J; Henley M; Bright J; Reeve J; Kalender W; Laval-Jeantet AM; Rüegsegger P; Felsenberg D; Adams J
    Osteoporos Int; 1995 May; 5(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 7655178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-Calibration of Bone Mineral Densities and Body Composition between GE Lunar Prodigy and Osteosys Primus.
    Ha YC; Yoo JI
    J Bone Metab; 2021 Aug; 28(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 34520655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
    Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the vertebrae: determining which vertebrae should be scanned].
    Rubinacci A; De Ponti A; Moro GL; Sirtori P; Galli L
    Radiol Med; 1992 Dec; 84(6):725-30. PubMed ID: 1494672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Effect of very dense artifacts on Hologic and general electric bone densitometry results".
    Morgan SL; Krueger D; Bassler J; Burroughs L; Borchardt G; Yester M; Binkley N; Redden D
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 May; 15(1):77. PubMed ID: 32436138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
    Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis.
    Peel NF; Eastell R
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Mar; 9(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 8191924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.