These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26083361)

  • 1. Protected Area Tourism in a Changing Climate: Will Visitation at US National Parks Warm Up or Overheat?
    Fisichelli NA; Schuurman GW; Monahan WB; Ziesler PS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128226. PubMed ID: 26083361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Projected avifaunal responses to climate change across the U.S. National Park System.
    Wu JX; Wilsey CB; Taylor L; Schuurman GW
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0190557. PubMed ID: 29561837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Park Visitors' Place Attachment and Climate Change-related Displacement: Potential Shifts in Who, Where, and When.
    Perry EE; Xiao X; Nettles JM; Iretskaia TA; Manning RE
    Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 68(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 33991206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exposure of U.S. National Parks to land use and climate change 1900-2100.
    Hansen AJ; Piekielek N; Davis C; Haas J; Theobald DM; Gross JE; Monahan WB; Olliff T; Running SW
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Apr; 24(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 24834735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Species-free species distribution models describe macroecological properties of protected area networks.
    Robinson JL; Fordyce JA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173443. PubMed ID: 28301488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bringing forecasting into the future: Using Google to predict visitation in U.S. national parks.
    Clark M; Wilkins EJ; Dagan DT; Powell R; Sharp RL; Hillis V
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 243():88-94. PubMed ID: 31082755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Climate exposure of US national parks in a new era of change.
    Monahan WB; Fisichelli NA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101302. PubMed ID: 24988483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using cellular device location data to estimate visitation to public lands: Comparing device location data to U.S. National Park Service's visitor use statistics.
    Tsai WL; Merrill NH; Neale AC; Grupper M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0289922. PubMed ID: 37943842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Air pollution and visitation at U.S. national parks.
    Keiser D; Lade G; Rudik I
    Sci Adv; 2018 Jul; 4(7):eaat1613. PubMed ID: 30035225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring recreational visitation at U.S. National Parks with crowd-sourced photographs.
    Sessions C; Wood SA; Rabotyagov S; Fisher DM
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):703-711. PubMed ID: 27641652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decreased air quality shows minimal influence on peak summer attendance at forested Pacific West national parks.
    Brown M; Jenkins J; Kolden C
    J Environ Manage; 2024 May; 358():120702. PubMed ID: 38631165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting climate-change induced heat-related illness risk in Grand Canyon National Park visitors.
    Buttke DE; Raynor B; Schuurman GW
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0288812. PubMed ID: 37556450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social media influences National Park visitation.
    Wichman CJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Apr; 121(15):e2310417121. PubMed ID: 38557173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Projected changes in bird assemblages due to climate change in a Canadian system of protected areas.
    Gahbauer MA; Parker SR; Wu JX; Harpur C; Bateman BL; Whitaker DM; Tate DP; Taylor L; Lepage D
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262116. PubMed ID: 35061743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of climate change effects on Canada's National Park system.
    Suffling R; Scott D
    Environ Monit Assess; 2002 Mar; 74(2):117-39. PubMed ID: 11878639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing protected area vulnerability to climate change in a case study of South African national parks.
    Coldrey KM; Turpie JK; Midgley G; Scheiter S; Hannah L; Roehrdanz PR; Foden WB
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13941. PubMed ID: 35648687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of spatial distribution and dynamic change in monthly FVC of urban parks.
    Zhang Y; Ge Y; Qiao L
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0308805. PubMed ID: 39178181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cetacean range and climate in the eastern North Atlantic: future predictions and implications for conservation.
    Lambert E; Pierce GJ; Hall K; Brereton T; Dunn TE; Wall D; Jepson PD; Deaville R; MacLeod CD
    Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jun; 20(6):1782-93. PubMed ID: 24677422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in bird abundance differ among protected forests but not bird guilds.
    Doser JW; Weed AS; Zipkin EF; Miller KM; Finley AO
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Sep; 31(6):e02377. PubMed ID: 33988277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Footprints of climate change in US national park visitation.
    Buckley LB; Foushee MS
    Int J Biometeorol; 2012 Nov; 56(6):1173-7. PubMed ID: 22109104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.