These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26085188)

  • 21. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In Vitro Effect of Mastication on the Retention and Wear of Locator Attachments in a Flat Mandibular Ridge Model.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Majzoub Z; Nahas P; Berberi A; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e744-e751. PubMed ID: 29968276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e666-e674. PubMed ID: 29143403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Interimplant Distance and Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Overdenture Attachments.
    Shayegh SS; Hakimaneh SM; Baghani MT; Shidfar S; Kashi FK; Zamanian A; Arezoobakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1078-1084. PubMed ID: 29109325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of abutment angulation in the retention and durability of three overdenture attachment systems: An in vitro study.
    Aroso C; Silva AS; Ustrell R; Mendes JM; Braga AC; Berastegui E; Escuin T
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2016 Feb; 8(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 26949484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    ELsyad MA; Errabti HM; Mustafa AZ
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):656-664. PubMed ID: 26376338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retentive force and dislodgment time variations between three implant overdenture stud attachments in an acidic environment: An in-vitro pilot study.
    Farhat M; Daher T; Hajjar JJ; Boulos PJ
    Saudi Dent J; 2024 Feb; 36(2):368-373. PubMed ID: 38419987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retentive Characteristics of a New Attachment System for Hybrid Dentures.
    Arnold C; Stampa C; Schweyen R; Hey J; Boeckler A
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Aug; 13(15):. PubMed ID: 32759744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microbiological evaluation of LOCATOR® Legacy attachments: A cross-sectional clinical study.
    Nagy U; Guédat C; Giannopoulou C; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Oct; 5(5):476-484. PubMed ID: 31687180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical evaluation of inter-implant distance influence on the wear characteristics of low-profile stud attachments used in mandibular implant‑retained overdentures.
    El Mekawy N; Elhawary MY
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Jan; 11(1):e33-e41. PubMed ID: 30697392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1-8 years of follow-up.
    Guédat C; Nagy U; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2018 Aug; 4(4):132-145. PubMed ID: 30181910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retentive characteristics of individual and prefabricated polyvinylsiloxane overdenture attachments: alternative treatment options for geriatric patients.
    Schweyen R; Arnold C; Setz JM; Hey J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 30032470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CAD/CAM milled removable complete dentures: an in vitro evaluation of trueness.
    Srinivasan M; Cantin Y; Mehl A; Gjengedal H; Müller F; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jul; 21(6):2007-2019. PubMed ID: 27826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro retention force changes during cyclic dislodging of three novel attachment systems for implant overdentures with different implant angulations.
    Maniewicz S; Badoud I; Herrmann FR; Chebib N; Ammann P; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Apr; 31(4):315-327. PubMed ID: 31876004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features.
    Alsabeeha NH; Payne AG; Swain MV
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 20095190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical aspects on overdenture treatment.
    Glantz PO; Nilner K
    J Dent; 1997 Jan; 25 Suppl 1():S21-4. PubMed ID: 9080748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.