These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26085310)

  • 21. Content Analysis of Informed Consent for Whole Genome Sequencing Offered by Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.
    Niemiec E; Borry P; Pinxten W; Howard HC
    Hum Mutat; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 27647801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: to test or not to test, that is the question.
    Dandara C; Greenberg J; Lambie L; Lombard Z; Naicker T; Ramesar R; Ramsay M; Roberts L; Theron M; Venter P; Bardien-Kruger S
    S Afr Med J; 2013 Jul; 103(8):510-2. PubMed ID: 23885726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ethical challenges in providing noninvasive prenatal diagnosis.
    Benn PA; Chapman AR
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 22(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 20098325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consumer Testing for Disease Risk: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 816.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 137(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 33399428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. I Had Genetic Testing for Alzheimer's Disease Without My Consent.
    Lucassen A
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2015; 5(3):214-6. PubMed ID: 26752571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Committee Opinion No. 724 Summary: Consumer Testing for Disease Risk.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):1176-1177. PubMed ID: 29064967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.
    Gagnon A;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Sep; 31(9):875-881. PubMed ID: 19941713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Family tree and ancestry inference: is there a need for a 'generational' consent?
    Wallace SE; Gourna EG; Nikolova V; Sheehan NA
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Dec; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 26645273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for predicting sports performance and talent identification: Consensus statement.
    Webborn N; Williams A; McNamee M; Bouchard C; Pitsiladis Y; Ahmetov I; Ashley E; Byrne N; Camporesi S; Collins M; Dijkstra P; Eynon N; Fuku N; Garton FC; Hoppe N; Holm S; Kaye J; Klissouras V; Lucia A; Maase K; Moran C; North KN; Pigozzi F; Wang G
    Br J Sports Med; 2015 Dec; 49(23):1486-91. PubMed ID: 26582191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Helping Patients Make Informed Choices.
    Mahon SM
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2018 Feb; 22(1):33-36. PubMed ID: 29350705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.
    Minear MA; Alessi S; Allyse M; Michie M; Chandrasekharan S
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2015; 16():369-98. PubMed ID: 26322648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Receipt of Selected Preventive Health Services for Women and Men of Reproductive Age - United States, 2011-2013.
    Pazol K; Robbins CL; Black LI; Ahrens KA; Daniels K; Chandra A; Vahratian A; Gavin LE
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2017 Oct; 66(20):1-31. PubMed ID: 29073129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis using cell-free fetal DNA technology: applications and implications.
    Hall A; Bostanci A; Wright CF
    Public Health Genomics; 2010; 13(4):246-55. PubMed ID: 20395693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.
    Audibert F; Gagnon A; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):754-67. PubMed ID: 21749753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Personal genomic screening: How best to facilitate preparedness of future clients.
    Fleming J; Terrill B; Dziadek M; Kirk EP; Roscioli T; Barlow-Stewart K
    Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 31085343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. All your data (effectively) belong to us: data practices among direct-to-consumer genetic testing firms.
    Laestadius LI; Rich JR; Auer PL
    Genet Med; 2017 May; 19(5):513-520. PubMed ID: 27657678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A New Wave of Genomics for All.
    Crow D
    Cell; 2019 Mar; 177(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 30901548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. For your interest? The ethical acceptability of using non-invasive prenatal testing to test 'purely for information'.
    Deans Z; Clarke AJ; Newson AJ
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 25521970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.