These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26085497)

  • 1. A field demonstration of the costs and benefits of group living to edible and defended prey.
    Curley EA; Rowley HE; Speed MP
    Biol Lett; 2015 Jun; 11(6):20150152. PubMed ID: 26085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Density-dependent investment in costly anti-predator defences: an explanation for the weak survival benefit of group living.
    Daly D; Higginson AD; Chen D; Ruxton GD; Speed MP
    Ecol Lett; 2012 Jun; 15(6):576-83. PubMed ID: 22487271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reciprocity in predator-prey interactions: exposure to defended prey and predation risk affects intermediate predator life history and morphology.
    Hammill E; Beckerman AP
    Oecologia; 2010 May; 163(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 19936795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aggregation, defence and warning signals: the evolutionary relationship.
    Ruxton GD; Sherratt TN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1600):2417-24. PubMed ID: 16959629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense.
    Sherratt TN; Beatty CD
    Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 14582002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioural Responses of Defended and Undefended Prey to Their Predator-A Case Study of Rotifera.
    Parry V; Schlägel UE; Tiedemann R; Weithoff G
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 36009844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences.
    Rowland HM; Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J; Speed MP
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7149):64-7. PubMed ID: 17611539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences.
    Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):780-91. PubMed ID: 17305843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defence mitigation by predators of chemically defended prey integrated over the predation sequence and across biological levels with a focus on cardiotonic steroids.
    Mohammadi S; Yang L; Bulbert M; Rowland HM
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Sep; 9(9):220363. PubMed ID: 36133149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numbers, neighbors, and hungry predators: What makes chemically defended aposematic prey susceptible to predation?
    Kaczmarek JM; Kaczmarski M; Mazurkiewicz J; Kloskowski J
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(24):13705-13716. PubMed ID: 33391674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Costs and benefits of defences induced by predators differing in dangerousness.
    Hettyey A; Vincze K; Zsarnóczai S; Hoi H; Laurila A
    J Evol Biol; 2011 May; 24(5):1007-19. PubMed ID: 21332859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How can automimicry persist when predators can preferentially consume undefended mimics?
    Ruxton GD; Speed MP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 273(1584):373-8. PubMed ID: 16543181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Group formation stabilizes predator-prey dynamics.
    Fryxell JM; Mosser A; Sinclair AR; Packer C
    Nature; 2007 Oct; 449(7165):1041-3. PubMed ID: 17960242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why aren't warning signals everywhere? On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities.
    Kikuchi DW; Herberstein ME; Barfield M; Holt RD; Mappes J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Dec; 96(6):2446-2460. PubMed ID: 34128583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Density-dependent effects of prey defences.
    Jeschke JM; Tollrian R
    Oecologia; 2000 May; 123(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 28308594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal investment across different aspects of anti-predator defences.
    Broom M; Higginson AD; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Apr; 263(4):579-86. PubMed ID: 20060842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of aggregation on visibility in open water.
    Ruxton GD; Johnsen S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Sep; 283(1839):. PubMed ID: 27655767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuous cycling of grouped vs. solitary strategy frequencies in a predator-prey model.
    Lett C; Auger P; Gaillard JM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2004 May; 65(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 15066422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aposematism: what should our starting point be?
    Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Feb; 272(1561):431-8. PubMed ID: 15734698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.