These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26086943)

  • 21. Propensity score studies are unlikely to underestimate treatment effects in critical care medicine: a critical reanalysis.
    Kitsios GD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):467-9. PubMed ID: 25555686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Review of Propensity-Score Methods and Their Use in Cardiovascular Research.
    Deb S; Austin PC; Tu JV; Ko DT; Mazer CD; Kiss A; Fremes SE
    Can J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 32(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 26315351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the acute care surgery literature: avoiding the pitfalls and proposing a set of reporting guidelines.
    Zakrison TL; Austin PC; McCredie VA
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 28342097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Propensity Score Methods to Estimate Treatment Effects: An Opportunity for Rehabilitation Service Research].
    Fauser D; Bethge M
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2019 Feb; 58(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 30769358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
    Ioannidis JP; Haidich AB; Pappa M; Pantazis N; Kokori SI; Tektonidou MG; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Lau J
    JAMA; 2001 Aug; 286(7):821-30. PubMed ID: 11497536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Fragility Index in Multicenter Randomized Controlled Critical Care Trials.
    Ridgeon EE; Young PJ; Bellomo R; Mucchetti M; Lembo R; Landoni G
    Crit Care Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):1278-84. PubMed ID: 26963326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.
    Concato J; Shah N; Horwitz RI
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Jun; 342(25):1887-92. PubMed ID: 10861325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Matics TJ; Khan N; Jani P; Kane JM
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2019 Jun; 20(6):e258-e262. PubMed ID: 31013262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Potential Pitfalls of Reporting and Bias in Observational Studies With Propensity Score Analysis Assessing a Surgical Procedure: A Methodological Systematic Review.
    Lonjon G; Porcher R; Ergina P; Fouet M; Boutron I
    Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):901-909. PubMed ID: 27232253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [What are the propensity scores?].
    Ojeda D; Gómez R; Burgos Á
    Rev Med Chil; 2016 Mar; 144(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 27299823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pilot Randomized Trials in Pediatric Critical Care: A Systematic Review.
    Duffett M; Choong K; Hartling L; Menon K; Thabane L; Cook DJ
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2015 Sep; 16(7):e239-44. PubMed ID: 26121101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Unknown confounders did not bias the treatment effect when improving balance of known confounders in randomized trials.
    Kuss O; Miller M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():9-16. PubMed ID: 32540383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Composite outcome measures in high-impact critical care randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.
    Walker HGM; Brown AJ; Vaz IP; Reed R; Schofield MA; Shao J; Nanjayya VB; Udy AA; Jeffcote T
    Crit Care; 2024 May; 28(1):184. PubMed ID: 38807143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A review of the use of propensity score methods with multiple treatment groups in the general internal medicine literature.
    Shurrab M; Ko DT; Jackevicius CA; Tu K; Middleton A; Michael F; Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2023 Aug; 32(8):817-831. PubMed ID: 37144449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of causality from observational studies and its application in clinical research in Intensive Care Medicine.
    Coscia Requena C; Muriel A; Peñuelas O
    Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2018; 42(5):292-300. PubMed ID: 29501284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Propensity score: A credible alternative to randomization?].
    Filleron T; Kwiatowski F
    Bull Cancer; 2016 Jan; 103(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 26657188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performing both propensity score and instrumental variable analyses in observational studies often leads to discrepant results: a systematic review.
    Laborde-Castérot H; Agrinier N; Thilly N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 68(10):1232-40. PubMed ID: 26026496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adjusted Analyses in Studies Addressing Therapy and Harm: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
    Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Shah ND; O'Donnell M; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(7):748-759. PubMed ID: 28241362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Propensity score matched augmented controls in randomized clinical trials: A case study.
    Lin J; Gamalo-Siebers M; Tiwari R
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):629-647. PubMed ID: 30066459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Propensity score-integrated composite likelihood approach for augmenting the control arm of a randomized controlled trial by incorporating real-world data.
    Chen WC; Wang C; Li H; Lu N; Tiwari R; Xu Y; Yue LQ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 May; 30(3):508-520. PubMed ID: 32370640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.