These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Coronary artery visualization using a 64-row multi-slice computed tomography in unselected patients with definite or suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Sosnowski M; Pysz P; Gola A; Szymański L; Tendera M Cardiol J; 2009; 16(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 19753519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of delayed enhancement patterns on multislice computed tomography immediately after coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocardial infarction. Habis M; Capderou A; Sigal-Cinqualbre A; Ghostine S; Rahal S; Riou JY; Brenot P; Angel CY; Paul JF Heart; 2009 Apr; 95(8):624-9. PubMed ID: 19052025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging. Lund GK; Stork A; Saeed M; Bansmann MP; Gerken JH; Müller V; Mester J; Higgins CB; Adam G; Meinertz T Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 15166320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Integration of infarct size, tissue perfusion, and metabolism by hybrid cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography: evaluation in a porcine model of myocardial infarction. Lautamäki R; Schuleri KH; Sasano T; Javadi MS; Youssef A; Merrill J; Nekolla SG; Abraham MR; Lardo AC; Bengel FM Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 19808610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Van Mieghem CA; Cademartiri F; Mollet NR; Malagutti P; Valgimigli M; Meijboom WB; Pugliese F; McFadden EP; Ligthart J; Runza G; Bruining N; Smits PC; Regar E; van der Giessen WJ; Sianos G; van Domburg R; de Jaegere P; Krestin GP; Serruys PW; de Feyter PJ Circulation; 2006 Aug; 114(7):645-53. PubMed ID: 16894038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantification of myocardial viability distribution with Gd(DTPA) bolus-enhanced, signal intensity-based percent infarct mapping. Kirschner R; Varga-Szemes A; Brott BC; Litovsky S; Elgavish A; Elgavish GA; Simor T Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jun; 29(5):650-8. PubMed ID: 21546192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MR imaging of reperfused myocardial infarction: comparison of necrosis-specific and intravascular contrast agents in a cat model. Lee SS; Goo HW; Park SB; Lim CH; Gong G; Seo JB; Lim TH Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):739-47. PubMed ID: 12601203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CT imaging of myocardial viability: experimental and clinical evidence. Mahnken AH; Mühlenbruch G; Günther RW; Wildberger JE Cardiovasc J Afr; 2007; 18(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 17612749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-dimensional rotational angiography fused with multimodal imaging modalities for targeted endomyocardial injections in the ischaemic heart. Dauwe DF; Nuyens D; De Buck S; Claus P; Gheysens O; Koole M; Coudyzer W; Vanden Driessche N; Janssens L; Ector J; Dymarkowski S; Bogaert J; Heidbuchel H; Janssens S Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Aug; 15(8):900-7. PubMed ID: 24596052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Usefulness of multidetector-row CT in the evaluation of reperfused myocardial infarction in a rabbit model. Park JM; Choe YH; Chang S; Sung YM; Kang SS; Kim MJ; Han BK; Choi SH Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15064555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography. Ital Heart J; 2004 Apr; 5(4):309-34. PubMed ID: 15185894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multidetector computed tomography in reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Assessment of infarct size and no-reflow in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Jacquier A; Boussel L; Amabile N; Bartoli JM; Douek P; Moulin G; Paganelli F; Saeed M; Revel D; Croisille P Invest Radiol; 2008 Nov; 43(11):773-81. PubMed ID: 18923256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can we perform coronary artery bypass grafting on the basis of computed tomographic angiography alone? A comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Bedi HS; Gill JA; Bakshi SS Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 33(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 18243721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acute myocardial infarct detection with dual energy CT: correlation with single photon emission computed tomography myocardial scintigraphy in a canine model. Peng J; Zhang LJ; Schoepf UJ; Gibbs KP; Ji HS; Yang GF; Zhu H; Lu GM Acta Radiol; 2013 Apr; 54(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 23543148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feasibility of Selective Catheter-Directed Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using Ultralow-Dose Intracoronary Contrast Injection in a Swine Model. Hong Y; Shin S; Park HB; Lee BK; Arsanjani R; ó Hartaigh B; Ha S; Jang Y; Jeon B; Jung S; Park SI; Sung JM; Shim H; Chang HJ Invest Radiol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):449-55. PubMed ID: 25816215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]