151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26088382)
1. Assessment of the regurgitant orifice area in aortic regurgitation with dual-source CT: Comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Ko SM; Park JH; Shin JK; Kim JS
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 26088382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography.
Li X; Tang L; Zhou L; Duan Y; Yanhui S; Yang R; Wu Y; Kong X
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Aug; 25(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 19350414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Altiok E; Frick M; Meyer CG; Al Ateah G; Napp A; Kirschfink A; Almalla M; Lotfi S; Becker M; Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1859-66. PubMed ID: 24837265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT.
Alkadhi H; Desbiolles L; Husmann L; Plass A; Leschka S; Scheffel H; Vachenauer R; Schepis T; Gaemperli O; Flohr TG; Genoni M; Marincek B; Jenni R; Kaufmann PA; Frauenfelder T
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 17717329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Quadricuspid Aortic Valves Using Cardiac Computed Tomography.
Song I; Park JA; Choi BH; Ko SM; Shin JK; Chee HK; Kim JS
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 27390538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of severity of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.
Gabriel RS; Renapurkar R; Bolen MA; Verhaert D; Leiber M; Flamm SD; Griffin BP; Desai MY
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 108(7):1014-20. PubMed ID: 21784393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of CMR in quantification of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI.
Salaun E; Jacquier A; Theron A; Giorgi R; Lambert M; Jaussaud N; Hubert S; Collart F; Bonnet JL; Habib G; Cuisset T; Grisoli D
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 26188194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of aortic regurgitant fraction and volume with multi-detector computed tomography comparison with echocardiography.
Feuchtner GM; Spoeck A; Lessick J; Dichtl W; Plass A; Leschka S; Mueller S; Klauser A; Scheffel H; Wolf F; Jaschke W; Alkadhi H
Acad Radiol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 21295735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and pulsed Doppler of the left subclavian artery: harmonizing grading scales between imaging modalities.
Spampinato RA; Jahnke C; Paetsch I; Hilbert S; Löbe S; Lindemann F; Strotdrees E; Hindricks G; Borger MA
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1517-1526. PubMed ID: 32306157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Planimetric measurement of the regurgitant orifice area using multidetector CT for aortic regurgitation: a comparison with the use of echocardiography.
Jeon MH; Choe YH; Cho SJ; Park SW; Park PW; Oh JK
Korean J Radiol; 2010; 11(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 20191064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance to Evaluate Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Ribeiro HB; Orwat S; Hayek SS; Larose É; Babaliaros V; Dahou A; Le Ven F; Pasian S; Puri R; Abdul-Jawad Altisent O; Campelo-Parada F; Clavel MA; Pibarot P; Lerakis S; Baumgartner H; Rodés-Cabau J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 68(6):577-585. PubMed ID: 27491900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment and quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Ribeiro HB; Le Ven F; Larose E; Dahou A; Nombela-Franco L; Urena M; Allende R; Amat-Santos I; Ricapito Mde L; Thébault C; Clavel MA; Delarochelliére R; Doyle D; Dumont E; Dumesnil JG; Pibarot P; Rodés-Cabau J
Heart; 2014 Dec; 100(24):1924-32. PubMed ID: 25124218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative assessment of pure aortic valve regurgitation with dual-source CT.
Li Z; Huang L; Chen X; Xia C; Yuan Y; Shuai T
Clin Radiol; 2012 Jul; 67(7):643-8. PubMed ID: 22316595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of Aortic Valve Regurgitation by Pulsed Doppler Examination of the Left Subclavian Artery Velocity Contour: A Validation Study with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Spampinato RA; Jahnke C; Paetsch I; Hilbert S; Busch F; Schloma V; Dmitrieva Y; Bonamigo Thome F; Löbe S; Strotdrees E; Hindricks G; Mohr FW; Borger MA
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Jan; 31(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 29191732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cardiac valvular regurgitant lesions by cardiac MRI sequences: comparison of a four-valve semi-quantitative versus quantitative approach.
Reddy ST; Shah M; Doyle M; Thompson DV; Williams RB; Yamrozik J; Biederman RW
J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jul; 22(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 24224411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of aortic valve area measured by magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography.
Bruder O; Jochims M; Hunold P; Jensen C; Forsting M; Sabin GV; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 19452337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.
Cawley PJ; Hamilton-Craig C; Owens DS; Krieger EV; Strugnell WE; Mitsumori L; D'Jang CL; Schwaegler RG; Nguyen KQ; Nguyen B; Maki JH; Otto CM
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 6(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23212272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic regurgitation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography: intermodality disagreement impacting on prediction of post-surgical left ventricular remodeling.
Neisius U; Tsao CW; Hauser TH; Patel AD; Pierce P; Ben-Assa E; Nezafat R; Manning WJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 36(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 31414256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
