BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26088620)

  • 1. Comparison of Sulfur Hexafluoride 20% versus Air Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Güell JL; Morral M; Gris O; Elies D; Manero F
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Sep; 122(9):1757-64. PubMed ID: 26088620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 5% Sulfur Hexafluoride Versus 100% Air Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Ampazas P; Droutsas K; Giallouros E; Schroeder FM; Sekundo W
    Cornea; 2017 Oct; 36(10):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 28742620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride and air for donor attachment in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty in patients with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.
    Acar BT; Muftuoglu O; Acar S
    Cornea; 2014 Mar; 33(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24452211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Air Versus Sulfur Hexafluoride Gas Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Fellow Eye Comparison.
    von Marchtaler PV; Weller JM; Kruse FE; Tourtas T
    Cornea; 2018 Jan; 37(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 29040116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss.
    Guerra FP; Anshu A; Price MO; Giebel AW; Price FW
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Dec; 118(12):2368-73. PubMed ID: 21872938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) and Air Tamponade in Noniridectomized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Einan-Lifshitz A; Sorkin N; Boutin T; Showail M; Borovik A; Jamshidi F; Chan CC; Rootman DS
    Cornea; 2018 Mar; 37(3):273-276. PubMed ID: 29227339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sulfur Hexafluoride 20% Versus Air 100% for Anterior Chamber Tamponade in DMEK: A Meta-Analysis.
    Marques RE; Guerra PS; Sousa DC; Ferreira NP; Gonçalves AI; Quintas AM; Rodrigues W
    Cornea; 2018 Jun; 37(6):691-697. PubMed ID: 29561350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing sulfur hexafluoride (SF
    Schaub F; Enders P; Snijders K; Schrittenlocher S; Siebelmann S; Heindl LM; Bachmann BO; Cursiefen C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 101(7):902-908. PubMed ID: 27836829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Hamzaoglu EC; Straiko MD; Mayko ZM; Sáles CS; Terry MA
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Nov; 122(11):2193-9. PubMed ID: 26271841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora M; Quilendrino R; Ham L; Liarakos VS; van Dijk K; Baydoun L; Dapena I; Oellerich S; Melles GR
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Mar; 122(3):464-70. PubMed ID: 25439596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of 10% SF
    Rickmann A; Szurman P; Jung S; Boden KT; Wahl S; Haus A; Boden K; Januschowski K
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Apr; 43(4):482-486. PubMed ID: 29377740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results of single versus triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery).
    Chaurasia S; Price FW; Gunderson L; Price MO
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Feb; 121(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 24252821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival.
    Price MO; Giebel AW; Fairchild KM; Price FW
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2361-8. PubMed ID: 19875170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrathin descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes.
    Busin M; Madi S; Santorum P; Scorcia V; Beltz J
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1186-94. PubMed ID: 23466268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anterior Chamber Rebubbling With Perfluoropropane (C3F8) After Failed Rebubbling Attempts for Persistent Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Detachments.
    Keshet Y; Nahum Y; Bahar I; Livny E
    Cornea; 2019 Aug; 38(8):976-979. PubMed ID: 31107285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Maier AK; Gundlach E; Schroeter J; Klamann MK; Gonnermann J; Riechardt AI; Bertelmann E; Joussen AM; Torun N
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 253(6):895-900. PubMed ID: 25631845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of Consecutive Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes Throughout a 5-Year Period Performed by Two Experienced Surgeons.
    Schrittenlocher S; Schaub F; Hos D; Siebelmann S; Cursiefen C; Bachmann B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 190():171-178. PubMed ID: 29621512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty as treatment for graft failure after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Weller JM; Tourtas T; Kruse FE; Schlötzer-Schrehardt U; Fuchsluger T; Bachmann BO
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 159(6):1050-1057.e2. PubMed ID: 25790736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bimanual technique for insertion and positioning of endothelium-Descemet membrane graft in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Güell JL; Morral M; Gris O; Elies D; Manero F
    Cornea; 2013 Dec; 32(12):1521-6. PubMed ID: 24113369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Tourtas T; Laaser K; Bachmann BO; Cursiefen C; Kruse FE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1082-90.e2. PubMed ID: 22397955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.