These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26088705)

  • 1. One hundred and fifty years of sprint and distance running - Past trends and future prospects.
    Weiss M; Newman A; Whitmore C; Weiss S
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2016; 16(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 26088705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The potential impact of advanced footwear technology on the recent evolution of elite sprint performances.
    Mason J; Niedziela D; Morin JB; Groll A; Zech A
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16433. PubMed ID: 38034865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speed trends in male distance running.
    Kruse TN; Carter RE; Rosedahl JK; Joyner MJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112978. PubMed ID: 25409192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of the running anaerobic sprint test for assessing anaerobic power and predicting short-distance performances.
    Zagatto AM; Beck WR; Gobatto CA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Sep; 23(6):1820-7. PubMed ID: 19675478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of sex and specialty on the prediction of middle-distance running performances using the Mercier et al.'s nomogram.
    Coquart JB; Mercier D; Tabben M; Bosquet L
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(11):1124-31. PubMed ID: 25530319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environment and scheduling effects on sprint and middle distance running performances.
    Haïda A; Dor F; Guillaume M; Quinquis L; Marc A; Marquet LA; Antero-Jacquemin J; Tourny-Chollet C; Desgorces F; Berthelot G; Toussaint JF
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79548. PubMed ID: 24363791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of altitude on performance of elite track-and-field athletes.
    Hamlin MJ; Hopkins WG; Hollings SC
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2015 Oct; 10(7):881-7. PubMed ID: 25710483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in pacing behaviour between global championship medal performances and world records in men's and women's middle- and long-distance running track events.
    Casado A; Ranieri LE; Hanley B; Foster C; González-Mohíno F
    J Sports Sci; 2024 Feb; 42(4):358-364. PubMed ID: 38493354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Greater progression of athletic performance in older Masters athletes.
    Akkari A; Machin D; Tanaka H
    Age Ageing; 2015 Jul; 44(4):683-6. PubMed ID: 25753790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Unlikeliness of an Imminent Sub-2-Hour Marathon: Historical Trends of the Gender Gap in Running Events.
    Tucker R; Santos-Concejero J
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2017 Sep; 12(8):1017-1022. PubMed ID: 27967280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Countermovement jump peak force relative to body weight and jump height as predictors for sprint running performances: (in)homogeneity of track and field athletes?
    Markström JL; Olsson CJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Apr; 27(4):944-53. PubMed ID: 22692108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision in the prediction of middle distance-running performances using either a nomogram or the modeling of the distance-time relationship.
    Coquart JB; Bosquet L
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Nov; 24(11):2920-6. PubMed ID: 20581705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are there limits to running world records?
    Nevill AM; Whyte G
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2005 Oct; 37(10):1785-8. PubMed ID: 16260981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An improvement index to quantify the evolution of performance in running.
    Haake SJ; Foster LI; James DM
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(7):610-22. PubMed ID: 24073888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How 100-m event analyses improve our understanding of world-class men's and women's sprint performance.
    Slawinski J; Termoz N; Rabita G; Guilhem G; Dorel S; Morin JB; Samozino P
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Jan; 27(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 26644061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance trends in 161-km ultramarathons.
    Hoffman MD
    Int J Sports Med; 2010 Jan; 31(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20029736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is it time to consider a new performance classification for high-level male marathon runners?
    La Torre A; Vernillo G; Agnello L; Berardelli C; Rampinini E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Dec; 25(12):3242-7. PubMed ID: 22080326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of a nomogram to predict long distance running performance.
    Coquart JB; Alberty M; Bosquet L
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Oct; 23(7):2119-23. PubMed ID: 19855340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of track geometry on 200- and 400-m sprint running performance.
    Quinn MD
    J Sports Sci; 2009 Jan; 27(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 18979339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The gender difference in distance running performance has plateaued: an analysis of world rankings from 1980 to 1996.
    Sparling PB; O'Donnell EM; Snow TK
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Dec; 30(12):1725-9. PubMed ID: 9861606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.