These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26088739)

  • 1. Multiple levels of linguistic and paralinguistic features contribute to voice recognition.
    Zarate JM; Tian X; Woods KJ; Poeppel D
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11475. PubMed ID: 26088739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Different Types of Linguistic Information Impact Voice Perception: Evidence From the Language-Familiarity Effect.
    Yu K; Zhou Y; Zhang L; Li L; Li P; Wang R
    Lang Speech; 2023 Dec; 66(4):1007-1029. PubMed ID: 36680473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. L2 voice recognition: The role of speaker-, listener-, and stimulus-related factors.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3058. PubMed ID: 29195438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of intonation and lexical tone in tonal and non-tonal language speakers.
    Chien PJ; Friederici AD; Hartwigsen G; Sammler D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 May; 41(7):1842-1858. PubMed ID: 31957928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological considerations for interpreting the Language Familiarity Effect in talker processing.
    Levi SV
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 10(2):e1483. PubMed ID: 30328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reassessing the electrophysiological evidence for categorical perception of Mandarin lexical tone: ERP evidence from native and naïve non-native Mandarin listeners.
    Gao YA; Toscano JC; Shih C; Tanner D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):543-557. PubMed ID: 30378083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re-Examining the Effect of Top-Down Linguistic Information on Speaker-Voice Discrimination.
    Quinto A; Abu El Adas S; Levi SV
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 44(10):e12902. PubMed ID: 33025646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voice Emotion Recognition by Mandarin-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Ren L; Zhang Y; Zhang J; Qin Y; Zhang Z; Chen Z; Wei C; Liu Y
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):165-180. PubMed ID: 34288631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical dynamics of acoustic and phonological processing in speech perception.
    Zhang L; Xi J; Xu G; Shu H; Wang X; Li P
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e20963. PubMed ID: 21695133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increase in speech recognition due to linguistic mismatch between target and masker speech: monolingual and simultaneous bilingual performance.
    Calandruccio L; Zhou H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):1089-97. PubMed ID: 24167230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: an event-related potentials training study.
    Kaan E; Barkley CM; Bao M; Wayland R
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 9():53. PubMed ID: 18573210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification.
    Plante-Hébert J; Boucher VJ; Jemel B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250214. PubMed ID: 33861789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content.
    Brouwer S; Van Engen KJ; Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1449-64. PubMed ID: 22352516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Second Language Proficiency and Linguistic Uncertainty on Recognition of Speech in Native and Nonnative Competing Speech.
    Francis AL; Tigchelaar LJ; Zhang R; Zekveld AA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 61(7):1815-1830. PubMed ID: 29971338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental improvements in talker recognition are specific to the native language.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Feb; 202():104991. PubMed ID: 33096370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinct functional substrates along the right superior temporal sulcus for the processing of voices.
    Kriegstein KV; Giraud AL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):948-55. PubMed ID: 15193626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.