These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26089139)

  • 21. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
    Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Normative Nasalance Scores for Middle-Aged and Elderly Speakers of Brazilian Portuguese.
    Marino VCC; Cardoso VM; de Boer G; Dutka JCR; Fabbron EMG; Bressmann T
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2018; 70(2):82-89. PubMed ID: 30041244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nasalance measures in Marathi consonant-vowel-consonant syllables with pressure consonants produced by children with and without cleft lip and palate.
    Nandurkar A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Jan; 39(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 11772171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of vowels on nasalance scores.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T; Quint T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 11108528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children.
    van Doorn J; Purcell A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jul; 35(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 9684764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nasometric evaluation of resonance disorders: A norm study In Turkish.
    Ünal-Logacev Ö; Kummer AW; Çetin C; Topbaş S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109888. PubMed ID: 31981919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Immediate effects of voice focus adjustments on hypernasal speakers' nasalance scores.
    Santoni C; Thaut M; Bressmann T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110107. PubMed ID: 32480137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Normative nasalance scores in Tamil-speaking Indian children.
    Pokharel A; Naina P; Sebastain S; Syed KA; John M; Varghese AM
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2022 Apr; 47(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 33269640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech stimuli and nasalance scores for the assessment of resonance in in Mandarin speaking Malaysian children.
    Mohd Ibrahim H; Lim HW; Ahmad Rusli Y; Lim CT
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2020 Jun; 34(6):554-565. PubMed ID: 31537131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained from the Nasometer and the NasalView.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12498604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.
    Bressmann T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 16001925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The comparative study of resonance disorders for Vietnamese and Korean cleft palate speakers using nasometer.
    Shin YJ; Kim Y; Kim HG
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 39(1):9. PubMed ID: 28497031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers.
    El-Kassabi RM; Hassan S; Mesallam TA; Malki KH; Farahat M; Alfaris A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Jul; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 24854781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nasality evaluation of Turkish phonemes in vowel-consonant combinations.
    Sarac ET; Kayikci ME; Ozkan S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 75(7):894-8. PubMed ID: 21612830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of different calibration schedules on the test-retest differences of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer 6450.
    Hahm J; Bressmann T
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2022 Mar; 36(2-3):292-300. PubMed ID: 34554041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nasalance of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking populations from two different states.
    Maturo DS; Pirola MN; Ricz LN; Trawitzki LV
    Codas; 2017 Mar; 29(2):e20160041. PubMed ID: 28327782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nasalance measures in Cantonese-speaking women.
    Whitehill TL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 11294539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The differential influence of vowels and palatal covering on nasalance scores.
    Blanton A; Watterson T; Lewis K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Jan; 52(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 24805775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Normative Nasalance Scores for Brazilian Portuguese Using New Speech Stimuli.
    Marino VC; Dutka Jde C; de Boer G; Cardoso VM; Ramos RG; Bressmann T
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2015; 67(5):238-44. PubMed ID: 26844554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.