BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26089301)

  • 1. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
    Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
    Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
    Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
    Zhu HY; Xue YM; Yang LY; Jiang LY; Ling C; Tong XM; Zhang SY
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Sep; 32(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26238389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
    Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
    Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
    Sifer C; Sermondade N; Dupont C; Poncelet C; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Benzacken B; Levy R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a natural or mildly hormonally stimulated cycle in women with regular ovulatory cycles: a RCT.
    Peeraer K; Couck I; Debrock S; De Neubourg D; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Meuleman C; D'Hooghe T
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2552-62. PubMed ID: 26364081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
    Veleva Z; Orava M; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2425-31. PubMed ID: 23756705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cumulative pregnancy rates of two strategies: Day 3 fresh embryo transfer followed by Day 3 or Day 5/6 vitrification and embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mengels A; Van Muylder A; Peeraer K; Luyten J; Laenen A; Spiessens C; Debrock S
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 37886820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts.
    Van Landuyt L; Polyzos NP; De Munck N; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2509-18. PubMed ID: 26364080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.
    Bourdon M; Pocate-Cheriet K; Finet de Bantel A; Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Amar Hoffet A; Arbo E; Poulain M; Santulli P
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1948-1964. PubMed ID: 31644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
    Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? A randomized controlled trial.
    van de Vijver A; Polyzos NP; Van Landuyt L; Mackens S; Stoop D; Camus M; De Vos M; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1097-104. PubMed ID: 27005893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of day 3 embryo morphometrics and morphokinetics on survival and implantation after slow freezing-thawing and after vitrification-warming: a retrospective cohort study.
    Fernandez Gallardo E; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe T; Debrock S
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Oct; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28974230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns.
    Kaartinen N; Kananen K; Huhtala H; Keränen S; Tinkanen H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar; 33(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 26749388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of modified quarter laser-assisted zona thinning on the implantation rate per embryo in frozen/vitrified-thawed/warmed embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Debrock S; Peeraer K; Spiessens C; Willemen D; De Loecker P; D'Hooghe TM
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1997-2007. PubMed ID: 21659315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 68.