These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26089347)
1. Static and Dynamic Facial Cues Differentially Affect the Consistency of Social Evaluations. Hehman E; Flake JK; Freeman JB Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1123-34. PubMed ID: 26089347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facial expressions of authenticity: Emotion variability increases judgments of trustworthiness and leadership. Slepian ML; Carr EW Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():82-98. PubMed ID: 30445313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The visibility of social class from facial cues. Bjornsdottir RT; Rule NO J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Oct; 113(4):530-546. PubMed ID: 28557470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Facial-Action Imposter: How Head Tilt Influences Perceptions of Dominance From a Neutral Face. Witkower Z; Tracy JL Psychol Sci; 2019 Jun; 30(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 31009583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Seeing the world through others' minds: Inferring social context from behaviour. Teoh Y; Wallis E; Stephen ID; Mitchell P Cognition; 2017 Feb; 159():48-60. PubMed ID: 27886521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. I care, even after the first impression: Facial appearance-based evaluations in healthcare context. Mattarozzi K; Colonnello V; De Gioia F; Todorov A Soc Sci Med; 2017 Jun; 182():68-72. PubMed ID: 28419891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emotional expressions preferentially elicit implicit evaluations of faces also varying in race or age. Craig BM; Lipp OV; Mallan KM Emotion; 2014 Oct; 14(5):865-77. PubMed ID: 25046242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Memory for incidentally perceived social cues: Effects on person judgment. Pawling R; Kirkham AJ; Tipper SP; Over H Br J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 108(1):169-190. PubMed ID: 28059460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated. Sutherland CA; Young AW; Mootz CA; Oldmeadow JA Br J Psychol; 2015 May; 106(2):186-208. PubMed ID: 25168952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Freeman JB; Johnson KL; Ambady N; Rule NO Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1318-31. PubMed ID: 20682754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation. Tskhay KO; Feriozzo MM; Rule NO Perception; 2013; 42(10):1090-4. PubMed ID: 24494440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating physical and social cues when forming face preferences: differences among low and high-anxiety individuals. Conway CA; Jones BC; Debruine LM; Little AC; Hay J; Welling LL; Perrett DI; Feinberg DR Soc Neurosci; 2008; 3(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 18633850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Face of a fighter: Bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability. Zilioli S; Sell AN; Stirrat M; Jagore J; Vickerman W; Watson NV Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 24910133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deciphering the enigmatic face: the importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions. Ambadar Z; Schooler JW; Cohn JF Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 15869701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preference is biased by crowded facial expressions. Kouider S; Berthet V; Faivre N Psychol Sci; 2011 Feb; 22(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 21233479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]