These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26089347)

  • 1. Static and Dynamic Facial Cues Differentially Affect the Consistency of Social Evaluations.
    Hehman E; Flake JK; Freeman JB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1123-34. PubMed ID: 26089347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial expressions of authenticity: Emotion variability increases judgments of trustworthiness and leadership.
    Slepian ML; Carr EW
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():82-98. PubMed ID: 30445313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The visibility of social class from facial cues.
    Bjornsdottir RT; Rule NO
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Oct; 113(4):530-546. PubMed ID: 28557470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Facial-Action Imposter: How Head Tilt Influences Perceptions of Dominance From a Neutral Face.
    Witkower Z; Tracy JL
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jun; 30(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 31009583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seeing the world through others' minds: Inferring social context from behaviour.
    Teoh Y; Wallis E; Stephen ID; Mitchell P
    Cognition; 2017 Feb; 159():48-60. PubMed ID: 27886521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. I care, even after the first impression: Facial appearance-based evaluations in healthcare context.
    Mattarozzi K; Colonnello V; De Gioia F; Todorov A
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Jun; 182():68-72. PubMed ID: 28419891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emotional expressions preferentially elicit implicit evaluations of faces also varying in race or age.
    Craig BM; Lipp OV; Mallan KM
    Emotion; 2014 Oct; 14(5):865-77. PubMed ID: 25046242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory for incidentally perceived social cues: Effects on person judgment.
    Pawling R; Kirkham AJ; Tipper SP; Over H
    Br J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 108(1):169-190. PubMed ID: 28059460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.
    Sutherland CA; Young AW; Mootz CA; Oldmeadow JA
    Br J Psychol; 2015 May; 106(2):186-208. PubMed ID: 25168952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues.
    Freeman JB; Johnson KL; Ambady N; Rule NO
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1318-31. PubMed ID: 20682754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Valenced appearance-behavior cues affect the extent of impression memory.
    Cassidy BS
    Memory; 2020 May; 28(5):642-654. PubMed ID: 32324098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of facial expression and facial identity in subjects with social developmental disorders.
    Hefter RL; Manoach DS; Barton JJ
    Neurology; 2005 Nov; 65(10):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16301491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Faces of Group Members Share Physical Resemblance.
    Hehman E; Flake JK; Freeman JB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Jan; 44(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 28914140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Very first impressions.
    Bar M; Neta M; Linz H
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 16768559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial Trustworthiness Predicts Extreme Criminal-Sentencing Outcomes.
    Wilson JP; Rule NO
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1325-31. PubMed ID: 26162847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation.
    Tskhay KO; Feriozzo MM; Rule NO
    Perception; 2013; 42(10):1090-4. PubMed ID: 24494440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating physical and social cues when forming face preferences: differences among low and high-anxiety individuals.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; Debruine LM; Little AC; Hay J; Welling LL; Perrett DI; Feinberg DR
    Soc Neurosci; 2008; 3(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 18633850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face of a fighter: Bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability.
    Zilioli S; Sell AN; Stirrat M; Jagore J; Vickerman W; Watson NV
    Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 24910133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deciphering the enigmatic face: the importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions.
    Ambadar Z; Schooler JW; Cohn JF
    Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 15869701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference is biased by crowded facial expressions.
    Kouider S; Berthet V; Faivre N
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Feb; 22(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 21233479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.