These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26089721)

  • 1. Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.
    Kaniklidis C;
    Curr Oncol; 2015 Jun; 22(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 26089721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    US Preventive Services Task Force
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The balance sheet of benefits and harms of breast cancer population-based screening in Europe: outcome research, practice and future challenges.
    Broeders M; Paci E
    Womens Health (Lond); 2015 Nov; 11(6):883-90. PubMed ID: 26619214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials.
    Houssami N; Lång K; Bernardi D; Tagliafico A; Zackrisson S; Skaane P
    Breast; 2016 Apr; 26():119-34. PubMed ID: 27017251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
    Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations.
    Dang PA; Freer PE; Humphrey KL; Halpern EF; Rafferty EA
    Radiology; 2014 Jan; 270(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 24354377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening.
    Waldherr C; Cerny P; Altermatt HJ; Berclaz G; Ciriolo M; Buser K; Sonnenschein MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):226-31. PubMed ID: 23255766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.
    Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.
    Pace LE; Keating NL
    JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
    Friedewald SM; Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Durand MA; Plecha DM; Greenberg JS; Hayes MK; Copit DS; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Miller DP; Conant EF
    JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(24):2499-507. PubMed ID: 25058084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects.
    Zhou XH; Gordon R
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating Imaging Into the Locoregional Management of Breast Cancer.
    Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 26617206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.
    Roganovic D; Djilas D; Vujnovic S; Pavic D; Stojanov D
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 15(4):64-8. PubMed ID: 26614855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viewpoint: It is time to reconsider policy for population-based mammography screening.
    Kearney AJ
    J Public Health Policy; 2015 Aug; 36(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 26108575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-Related Changes in Yield and Harms of Screening Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Pederson HJ; O'Rourke C; Lyons J; Patrick RJ; Crowe JP; Grobmyer SR
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15(5):348-52. PubMed ID: 25749071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of modern mammography screening in the control of breast cancer: understanding the underpinnings of the current debates.
    Smith RA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Jul; 23(7):1139-46. PubMed ID: 24991021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.