These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Pediatric type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty outcomes: A comparison of short and long term hearing results. Kaya I; Benzer M; Gode S; Sahin F; Bilgen C; Kirazli T Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Aug; 45(4):722-727. PubMed ID: 29157625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tympanic reperforation in myringoplasty: evaluation of prognostic factors. Albera R; Ferrero V; Lacilla M; Canale A Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2006 Dec; 115(12):875-9. PubMed ID: 17214259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Myringoplasty in children. Rozendorn N; Wolf M; Yakirevich A; Shapira Y; Carmel E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 90():245-250. PubMed ID: 27729143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Results of inlay cartilage myringoplasty in terms of closure of central tympanic membrane perforations. Effat KG J Laryngol Otol; 2005 Aug; 119(8):611-3. PubMed ID: 16102215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pediatric myringoplasty: factors that affect success-a retrospective study. Sckolnick JS; Mantle B; Li J; Chi DH Laryngoscope; 2008 Apr; 118(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 18300712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The evaluation of cartilage and perichondrium grafts for the reconstruction of the tympanic membrane]. Slaska-Kaspera A; Gierek T; Majzel K; Klimczak-Gołab L Otolaryngol Pol; 2003; 57(6):889-92. PubMed ID: 15049192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty: otological and audiological results. Uslu C; Tek A; Tatlipinar A; Kiliçarslan Y; Durmuş R; Ayöğredik E; Karaman M; Oysu C Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 130(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 20151874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcomes of type I tympanoplasty using a cartilage shield graft in patients with poor prognostic factors. Heo KW Auris Nasus Larynx; 2017 Oct; 44(5):517-521. PubMed ID: 27955869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Prognostic factors influencing anatomic and functional outcome in myringoplasty]. Frade González C; Castro Vilas C; Cabanas Rodríguez E; Elhendi W; Vaamonde Lago P; Labella Caballero T Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2002 Dec; 53(10):729-35. PubMed ID: 12658839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endoscope or microscope-guided pediatric tympanoplasty? Comparison of grafting technique and outcome. James AL Laryngoscope; 2017 Nov; 127(11):2659-2664. PubMed ID: 28304079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three autologous substitutes for myringoplasty: a comparative study. Zhang ZG; Huang QH; Zheng YQ; Sun W; Chen YB; Si Y Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1234-8. PubMed ID: 21921853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty for large perforations. Demir E; Coskun ZO; Celiker M; Terzi S; Erdivanli OC; Balaban GA; Dursun E Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2791-2795. PubMed ID: 31346722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]