These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26090349)

  • 1. Accuracy of medical models made by consumer-grade fused deposition modelling printers.
    Petropolis C; Kozan D; Sigurdson L
    Plast Surg (Oakv); 2015; 23(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 26090349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casting Patterns Fabricated Using Consumer 3D Printers.
    Ishida Y; Miura D; Miyasaka T; Shinya A
    Polymers (Basel); 2020 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 33003507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional error in selective laser sintering and 3D-printing of models for craniomaxillary anatomy reconstruction.
    Silva DN; Gerhardt de Oliveira M; Meurer E; Meurer MI; Lopes da Silva JV; Santa-Bárbara A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 36(8):443-9. PubMed ID: 18579391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy.
    Ibrahim D; Broilo TL; Heitz C; de Oliveira MG; de Oliveira HW; Nobre SM; Dos Santos Filho JH; Silva DN
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 37(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 19056288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Additive Manufacturing: A Comparative Analysis of Dimensional Accuracy and Skin Texture Reproduction of Auricular Prostheses Replicas.
    Unkovskiy A; Spintzyk S; Axmann D; Engel EM; Weber H; Huettig F
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e460-e468. PubMed ID: 29125215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Problems and Solutions.
    Kamio T; Onda T
    Cureus; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e28906. PubMed ID: 36105906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of maxillofacial prototypes fabricated by different 3-dimensional printing technologies using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Yousefi F; Shokri A; Farhadian M; Vafaei F; Forutan F
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 33828960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of desktop versus professional 3D printers for maxillofacial model production. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Jacobs R
    J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103741. PubMed ID: 34224792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional Error in Rapid Prototyping with Open Source Software and Low-cost 3D-printer.
    Rendón-Medina MA; Andrade-Delgado L; Telich-Tarriba JE; Fuente-Del-Campo A; Altamirano-Arcos CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Jan; 6(1):e1646. PubMed ID: 29464171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterisation of fused deposition modeling 3D printers for pharmaceutical and medical applications.
    Feuerbach T; Kock S; Thommes M
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2018 Dec; 23(10):1136-1145. PubMed ID: 29938558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation.
    Hsu CP; Lin CS; Fan CH; Chiang NY; Tsai CW; Chang CM; Liu IL
    BMC Vet Res; 2020 Dec; 16(1):478. PubMed ID: 33298063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additive Manufacturing of Anatomical Models from Computed Tomography Scan Data.
    Gür Y
    Mol Cell Biomech; 2014 Dec; 11(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 26336695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilizing a low-cost desktop 3D printer to develop a "one-stop 3D printing lab" for oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry fields.
    Kamio T; Hayashi K; Onda T; Takaki T; Shibahara T; Yakushiji T; Shibui T; Kato H
    3D Print Med; 2018 Dec; 4(1):6. PubMed ID: 30148203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology.
    Msallem B; Sharma N; Cao S; Halbeisen FS; Zeilhofer HF; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32192099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of open-source software segmentation and paper-based printed three-dimensional models.
    Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M; Olszewski R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 44(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 26748414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing).
    Salmi M; Paloheimo KS; Tuomi J; Wolff J; Mäkitie A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):603-9. PubMed ID: 23333490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a "Low-Cost" 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer.
    Maschio F; Pandya M; Olszewski R
    Med Sci Monit; 2016 Mar; 22():943-57. PubMed ID: 27003456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies.
    Tagliaferri V; Trovalusci F; Guarino S; Venettacci S
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Dec; 12(24):. PubMed ID: 31835783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filament Advance Detection Sensor for Fused Deposition Modelling 3D Printers.
    Soriano Heras E; Blaya Haro F; de Agustín Del Burgo JM; Islán Marcos M; D'Amato R
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 May; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 29747458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing Microfluidic Performance of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Platforms.
    Macdonald NP; Cabot JM; Smejkal P; Guijt RM; Paull B; Breadmore MC
    Anal Chem; 2017 Apr; 89(7):3858-3866. PubMed ID: 28281349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.