These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2609102)

  • 1. Acoustical feedback associated with the use of post aural hearing aids for profoundly deaf children.
    Dyrlund O
    Scand Audiol; 1989; 18(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 2609102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gain and feedback problems when fitting behind-the-ear hearing aids to profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Dyrlund O; Lundh P
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 2371540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some relationships between hearing aid frequency response and speech discrimination of profoundly deaf children. Pilot study.
    Dyrlund O
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 3232020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of audiological assessment and hearing aid evaluation results from 13 deaf children].
    Zheng Y; Wang K; Meng Z; Tao Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 19(19):879-80. PubMed ID: 16419957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing loss and hearing aids: the Singapore School for the Deaf experience.
    Chan LP
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1991 Sep; 20(5):628-32. PubMed ID: 1781648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An approach to calculating gain requirements for severely deaf children as a function of hearing loss which is independent of frequency response.
    Morris T
    Scand Audiol; 1977; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 594633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aural rehabilitation for deaf children: a northeastern Thailand experience.
    Lertsukprasert K; Prathanee B
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Mar; 88(3):377-81. PubMed ID: 15962647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of hearing aids for severely deaf children.
    Byrne D
    Br J Audiol; 1978 Feb; 12(1):9-14, 19-22. PubMed ID: 647149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pseudoauditory air conduction thresholds in the deaf.
    McGargill RL; Egan JJ; Babbitt DC
    Audiology; 1977; 16(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 836254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech teaching for deaf children in the age of bilingual/bicultural programs: the role of tactile aids.
    Plant G; Horan M; Reed H
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():19-23. PubMed ID: 9428039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of hearing aids and cochlear implants in profoundly and totally deaf persons.
    Spillmann T; Dillier N
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Aug; 24(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 2224288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of rehabilitation for prelingual deaf children who use cochlear implants in conjunction with hearing aids in the opposite ears].
    Tian Y; Zhou H; Zhang J; Yang D; Xu Y; Guo Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):868-70, 873. PubMed ID: 23285948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of deaf children using ear-level and body-worn hearing aids.
    Meadow KP; Yannacone CG; Schlesinger HS; Yannacone C; Lage RV; Hynes-Peterson J
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 7185812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and sensitivity of intelligibility judgments by severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Ching T; Newall P; Wigney D
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():151-3. PubMed ID: 7545379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear implant--speech and language development in deaf and hard of hearing children following implantation.
    Ostojić S; Djoković S; Dimić N; Mikić B
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Apr; 68(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 21627020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Yadegari F; Jalaie S
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.
    Bond M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Elston J; Weiner G; Taylor RS; Hoyle M; Liu Z; Price A; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(44):1-330. PubMed ID: 19799825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.