BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26091397)

  • 1. Electrical Characterization of 3D Au Microelectrodes for Use in Retinal Prostheses.
    Lee S; Ahn JH; Seo JM; Chung H; Cho DI
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jun; 15(6):14345-55. PubMed ID: 26091397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical characteristics of 2D and 3D microelectrodes for high-resolution retinal prostheses.
    Lee S; Ahn J; Yoo H; Jung S; Oh S; Park S; Cho D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3535-8. PubMed ID: 24110492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implantable nanostructured MEA with biphasic current stimulator for retinal prostheses.
    Han S; Kim C; Kim K; Lee S
    Technol Health Care; 2023; 31(5):1981-1995. PubMed ID: 36872814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Honeycomb-Patterned Graphene Microelectrodes: A Promising Approach for Safe and Effective Retinal Stimulation Based on Electro-Thermo-Mechanical Modeling and Simulation.
    Asghar SA; Mahadevappa M
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2024 Apr; 23(2):262-271. PubMed ID: 37747869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The research on high-density flexible microelectrode array of retinal prosthesis based on MEMS technology].
    Feng G; Sui X; Wang Y; Li G; Chai X
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 37(6):407-10. PubMed ID: 24617208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 3D flexible microelectrode array for subretinal stimulation.
    Seo HW; Kim N; Ahn J; Cha S; Goo YS; Kim S
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(5):056016. PubMed ID: 31357188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo impedance evaluation of Au/PI microelectrode with surface modulated by alkanethiolate self-assembled monolayers.
    Lin HL; Lin CC; Ju MS; Liao JD
    Biomed Microdevices; 2011 Feb; 13(1):243-53. PubMed ID: 20972888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gold nanograin microelectrodes for neuroelectronic interfaces.
    Kim R; Hong N; Nam Y
    Biotechnol J; 2013 Feb; 8(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 23071004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of electrode materials for the use of retinal prosthesis.
    Onnela N; Takeshita H; Kaiho Y; Kojima T; Kobayashi R; Tanaka T; Hyttinen J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2011; 21(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 21654065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation of epiretinal prostheses - evaluation of geometrical factors affecting stimulation thresholds.
    Kasi H; Hasenkamp W; Cosendai G; Bertsch A; Renaud P
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Aug; 8():44. PubMed ID: 21854602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety ensuring retinal prosthesis with precise charge balance and low power consumption.
    Chun H; Yang Y; Lehmann T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2014 Feb; 8(1):108-18. PubMed ID: 24681924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term in vivo impedance changes of subretinal microelectrodes implanted in dystrophic P23H rats.
    Linderholm P; Guyomard JL; Djilas M; Salzmann J; Simonutti M; Sahel JA; Safran AB; Renaud P; Picaud S
    Int J Artif Organs; 2013 Oct; 36(9):612-9. PubMed ID: 23918262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible microelectrode array for retinal prosthesis.
    Bin Sun ; Tengyue Li ; Kai Xia ; Qi Zeng ; Tianzhun Wu ; Humayun MS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():1097-1100. PubMed ID: 29060066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of impedance at the microelectrode-saline and microelectrode-culture medium interface.
    Carter SJ; Linker CJ; Turkle-Huslig T; Howard LL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Nov; 39(11):1123-9. PubMed ID: 1487275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing of semichronically implanted retinal prosthesis by suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.
    Fujikado T; Kamei M; Sakaguchi H; Kanda H; Morimoto T; Ikuno Y; Nishida K; Kishima H; Maruo T; Konoma K; Ozawa M; Nishida K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(7):4726-33. PubMed ID: 21436271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects on Retinal Stimulation of the Geometry and the Insertion Location of Penetrating Electrodes.
    Son Y; Chen ZC; Roh H; Lee BC; Im M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():3803-3812. PubMed ID: 37729573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The research progress on microelectrode array (MEA) of retinal prosthesis].
    Li T; Cao Z; Sui X; Jiang X; Ren Q; Chai X
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2010 Sep; 34(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 21179713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo electrical impedance spectroscopy of tissue reaction to microelectrode arrays.
    Mercanzini A; Colin P; Bensadoun JC; Bertsch A; Renaud P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jul; 56(7):1909-18. PubMed ID: 19362904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical properties of retinal-electrode interface.
    Shah S; Hines A; Zhou D; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS; Weiland JD
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Mar; 4(1):S24-9. PubMed ID: 17325413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 8-Channel Biphasic Current Stimulator Optimized for Retinal Prostheses.
    Lee CE; Jung Y; Song YK
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2021 Aug; 21(8):4298-4302. PubMed ID: 33714317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.