253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26091399)
1. DELTA: A Distal Enhancer Locating Tool Based on AdaBoost Algorithm and Shape Features of Chromatin Modifications.
Lu Y; Qu W; Shan G; Zhang C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130622. PubMed ID: 26091399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancer prediction in the human genome by probabilistic modelling of the chromatin feature patterns.
Osmala M; Lähdesmäki H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):317. PubMed ID: 32689977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome.
Heintzman ND; Stuart RK; Hon G; Fu Y; Ching CW; Hawkins RD; Barrera LO; Van Calcar S; Qu C; Ching KA; Wang W; Weng Z; Green RD; Crawford GE; Ren B
Nat Genet; 2007 Mar; 39(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 17277777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ChromaSig: a probabilistic approach to finding common chromatin signatures in the human genome.
Hon G; Ren B; Wang W
PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Oct; 4(10):e1000201. PubMed ID: 18927605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genome-wide enhancer prediction from epigenetic signatures using genetic algorithm-optimized support vector machines.
Fernández M; Miranda-Saavedra D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 May; 40(10):e77. PubMed ID: 22328731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RFECS: a random-forest based algorithm for enhancer identification from chromatin state.
Rajagopal N; Xie W; Li Y; Wagner U; Wang W; Stamatoyannopoulos J; Ernst J; Kellis M; Ren B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(3):e1002968. PubMed ID: 23526891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chromatin signature discovery via histone modification profile alignments.
Wang J; Lunyak VV; Jordan IK
Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Nov; 40(21):10642-56. PubMed ID: 22989711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of regulatory elements in mammalian genomes using chromatin signatures.
Won KJ; Chepelev I; Ren B; Wang W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():547. PubMed ID: 19094206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discover regulatory DNA elements using chromatin signatures and artificial neural network.
Firpi HA; Ucar D; Tan K
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jul; 26(13):1579-86. PubMed ID: 20453004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chromatin proteomics reveals novel combinatorial histone modification signatures that mark distinct subpopulations of macrophage enhancers.
Soldi M; Mari T; Nicosia L; Musiani D; Sigismondo G; Cuomo A; Pavesi G; Bonaldi T
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):12195-12213. PubMed ID: 28981749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genome-wide prediction of conserved and nonconserved enhancers by histone acetylation patterns.
Roh TY; Wei G; Farrell CM; Zhao K
Genome Res; 2007 Jan; 17(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17135569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate Promoter and Enhancer Identification in 127 ENCODE and Roadmap Epigenomics Cell Types and Tissues by GenoSTAN.
Zacher B; Michel M; Schwalb B; Cramer P; Tresch A; Gagneur J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169249. PubMed ID: 28056037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Opening up the blackbox: an interpretable deep neural network-based classifier for cell-type specific enhancer predictions.
Kim SG; Theera-Ampornpunt N; Fang CH; Harwani M; Grama A; Chaterji S
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):54. PubMed ID: 27490187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genome-wide mapping of transcriptional enhancer candidates using DNA and chromatin features in maize.
Oka R; Zicola J; Weber B; Anderson SN; Hodgman C; Gent JI; Wesselink JJ; Springer NM; Hoefsloot HCJ; Turck F; Stam M
Genome Biol; 2017 Jul; 18(1):137. PubMed ID: 28732548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DEEP: a general computational framework for predicting enhancers.
Kleftogiannis D; Kalnis P; Bajic VB
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jan; 43(1):e6. PubMed ID: 25378307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. RNA transcribed from a distal enhancer is required for activating the chromatin at the promoter of the gonadotropin α-subunit gene.
Pnueli L; Rudnizky S; Yosefzon Y; Melamed P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(14):4369-74. PubMed ID: 25810254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting chromatin organization using histone marks.
Huang J; Marco E; Pinello L; Yuan GC
Genome Biol; 2015 Aug; 16(1):162. PubMed ID: 26272203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancer prediction with histone modification marks using a hybrid neural network model.
Lim A; Lim S; Kim S
Methods; 2019 Aug; 166():48-56. PubMed ID: 30905748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In silico identification of enhancers on the basis of a combination of transcription factor binding motif occurrences.
Fang Y; Wang Y; Zhu Q; Wang J; Li G
Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32476. PubMed ID: 27582178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture.
Cubeñas-Potts C; Rowley MJ; Lyu X; Li G; Lei EP; Corces VG
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):1714-1730. PubMed ID: 27899590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
