These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26091595)

  • 1. Do Probability and Certainty Equivalent Techniques Lead to Inconsistent Results? Evidence from Gambles Involving Life-Years and Quality of Life.
    Ruggeri M; Coretti S
    Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):413-24. PubMed ID: 26091595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames.
    Oliver A
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2219-29. PubMed ID: 15047079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is risk attitude outcome specific within the health domain?
    van der Pol M; Ruggeri M
    J Health Econ; 2008 May; 27(3):706-17. PubMed ID: 18178278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Disjunction Effect in two-stage simulated gambles. An experimental study and comparison of a heuristic logistic, Markov and quantum-like model.
    Broekaert JB; Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Mar; 117():101262. PubMed ID: 31865226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shifted risk preferences in pathological gambling.
    Ligneul R; Sescousse G; Barbalat G; Domenech P; Dreher JC
    Psychol Med; 2013 May; 43(5):1059-68. PubMed ID: 22932231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do risk attitudes differ across domains and respondent types?
    Prosser LA; Wittenberg E
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 17545498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explaining distortions in utility elicitation through the rank-dependent model for risky choices.
    Wakker P; Stiggelbout A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 7783579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the reference point in prospect theory: gambles for length of life.
    van Osch SM; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 16855123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health status utility assessment by standard gamble: a comparison of the probability equivalence and the lottery equivalence approaches.
    Law AV; Pathak DS; McCord MR
    Pharm Res; 1998 Jan; 15(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 9487555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anticipated regret, risk perception, or both: which is most likely responsible for our intention to gamble?
    Li S; Zhou K; Sun Y; Rao LL; Zheng R; Liang ZY
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 19728049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating risk attitude into Markov-process decision models: importance for individual decision making.
    Cher DJ; Miyamoto J; Lenert LA
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 9219195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Salience-Driven Value Construction for Adaptive Choice under Risk.
    Spitmaan M; Chu E; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 39(26):5195-5209. PubMed ID: 31023835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expected utility theory and risky choices with health outcomes.
    Hellinger FJ
    Med Care; 1989 Mar; 27(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 2927183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changing plans: dynamic inconsistency and the effect of experience on the reference point.
    Barkan R; Busemeyer JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Dec; 6(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 10682196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk attitude in gambles with years of life: empirical support for prospect theory.
    Verhoef LC; de Haan AF; van Daal WA
    Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8028473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities.
    van Osch SM; Wakker PP; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):511-7. PubMed ID: 15359000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the composition of risk preference and belief.
    Wakkar PP
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 14756595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eliciting Health State Utilities Using Paired-Gamble Methods: The Role of the Starting Point.
    Rodríguez-Míguez E; Pinto-Prades JL; Mosquera-Nogueira J
    Value Health; 2019 Apr; 22(4):446-452. PubMed ID: 30975396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information overload or search-amplified risk? Set size and order effects on decisions from experience.
    Hills TT; Noguchi T; Gibbert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 23516097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.