209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26092010)
1. Face and construct validation of a next generation virtual reality (Gen2-VR) surgical simulator.
Sankaranarayanan G; Li B; Manser K; Jones SB; Jones DB; Schwaitzberg S; Cao CG; De S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):979-85. PubMed ID: 26092010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial.
Frederiksen JG; Sørensen SMD; Konge L; Svendsen MBS; Nobel-Jørgensen M; Bjerrum F; Andersen SAW
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 31172325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New dimensions in surgical training: immersive virtual reality laparoscopic simulation exhilarates surgical staff.
Huber T; Paschold M; Hansen C; Wunderling T; Lang H; Kneist W
Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4472-4477. PubMed ID: 28378077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychomotor skills and cognitive load training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for tubal surgery is effective.
Bharathan R; Vali S; Setchell T; Miskry T; Darzi A; Aggarwal R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 23608628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller.
Lahanas V; Loukas C; Georgiou K; Lababidi H; Al-Jaroudi D
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5012-5023. PubMed ID: 28466361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Highly immersive virtual reality laparoscopy simulation: development and future aspects.
Huber T; Wunderling T; Paschold M; Lang H; Kneist W; Hansen C
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Feb; 13(2):281-290. PubMed ID: 29151194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulation-Based Training Platforms for Arthroscopy: A Randomized Comparison of Virtual Reality Learning to Benchtop Learning.
Middleton RM; Alvand A; Garfjeld Roberts P; Hargrove C; Kirby G; Rees JL
Arthroscopy; 2017 May; 33(5):996-1003. PubMed ID: 28073670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial.
Bongers PJ; Diederick van Hove P; Stassen LP; Dankelman J; Schreuder HW
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25439179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can virtual reality simulation be used for advanced bariatric surgical training?
Lewis TM; Aggarwal R; Kwasnicki RM; Rajaretnam N; Moorthy K; Ahmed A; Darzi A
Surgery; 2012 Jun; 151(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 22652118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The added value of virtual reality technology and force feedback for surgical training simulators.
Zhang L; Grosdemouge C; Arikatla VS; Ahn W; Sankaranarayanan G; De S; Jones D; Schwaitzberg S; Cao CG
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2288-92. PubMed ID: 22317056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS: are we ready for skills assessment using simulators?
Maithel S; Sierra R; Korndorffer J; Neumann P; Dawson S; Callery M; Jones D; Scott D
Surg Endosc; 2006 Jan; 20(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 16333535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center.
Stefanidis D; Haluck R; Pham T; Dunne JB; Reinke T; Markley S; Korndorffer JR; Arellano P; Jones DB; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1158-64. PubMed ID: 17149551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.
Verdaasdonk EG; Stassen LP; Monteny LJ; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2006 Mar; 20(3):511-8. PubMed ID: 16437275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Face, content, and construct validity of the virtual immersive operating room simulator for training laparoscopic procedures.
Pérez-Escamirosa F; García-Cabra DA; Ortiz-Hernández JR; Montoya-Alvarez S; Ruíz-Vereo EA; Ordorica-Flores RM; Minor-Martínez A; Tapia-Jurado J
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2885-2896. PubMed ID: 36509946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Force and Psychomotor Skills in a Novel Virtual Reality-Based Haptic Simulator.
Prasad MS; Manivannan M; Manoharan G; Chandramohan SM
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):858-69. PubMed ID: 27267563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construct and face validity of a virtual reality-based camera navigation curriculum.
Shetty S; Panait L; Baranoski J; Dudrick SJ; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Duffy AJ
J Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 177(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 22739048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.
Sirimanna P; Gladman MA
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Oct; 87(10):760-766. PubMed ID: 28803457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. OR fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity.
Dorozhkin D; Olasky J; Jones DB; Schwaitzberg SD; Jones SB; Cao CGL; Molina M; Henriques S; Wang J; Flinn J; De S;
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3527-3533. PubMed ID: 28039649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
