These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26093155)

  • 1. Allocation of cognitive resources in comparative visual search--individual and task dependent effects.
    Hardiess G; Mallot HA
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):71-7. PubMed ID: 26093155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decomposing task-switching costs with the diffusion model.
    Schmitz F; Voss A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):222-50. PubMed ID: 22060144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast and fragile: A new look at the automaticity of negation processing.
    Deutsch R; Kordts-Freudinger R; Gawronski B; Strack F
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(6):434-46. PubMed ID: 19502204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing energetic and cognitive resources: memory use during search depends on the orienting effector.
    Solman GJ; Kingstone A
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):443-54. PubMed ID: 24946208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory.
    Infanti E; Hickey C; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():22-9. PubMed ID: 25481632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in the capacity of visual working memory in 5- to 10-year-olds.
    Riggs KJ; McTaggart J; Simpson A; Freeman RP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Sep; 95(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16678845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
    Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
    Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual search performance is predicted by the degree to which selective attention to features modulates the ERP between 350 and 600ms.
    Milne E; Dunn SA; Freeth M; Rosas-Martinez L
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 May; 51(6):1109-18. PubMed ID: 23499721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate metacognition for visual sensory memory representations.
    Vandenbroucke AR; Sligte IG; Barrett AB; Seth AK; Fahrenfort JJ; Lamme VA
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Apr; 25(4):861-73. PubMed ID: 24549293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maintaining information in visual working memory: Memory for bindings and memory for features are equally disrupted by increased attentional demands.
    Vergauwe E; Langerock N; Barrouillet P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 25383473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
    Shipstead Z; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No role for motor affordances in visual working memory.
    Pecher D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 22612171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trade-offs in visual attention and the enhancement of memory specificity for positive and negative emotional stimuli.
    Chipchase SY; Chapman P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):277-98. PubMed ID: 22928471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.