These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26093155)

  • 41. Improving attention control in dysphoria through cognitive training: transfer effects on working memory capacity and filtering efficiency.
    Owens M; Koster EH; Derakshan N
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 23350956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs.
    Vermeulen N; Corneille O; Niedenthal PM
    Cognition; 2008 Nov; 109(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 18996513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Multisensory executive functioning.
    Hunt AR; Kingstone A
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):325-7. PubMed ID: 15177806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The influence of expertise and of physical complexity on visual short-term memory consolidation.
    Sun H; Zimmer HD; Fu X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):707-29. PubMed ID: 20924987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Lacking control over the trade-off between quality and quantity in visual short-term memory.
    Murray AM; Nobre AC; Astle DE; Stokes MG
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e41223. PubMed ID: 22905099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Working memory load improves early stages of independent visual processing.
    Cocchi L; Toepel U; De Lucia M; Martuzzi R; Wood SJ; Carter O; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 20974157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dividing the mind: the necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW; Heinke D
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1282-9. PubMed ID: 16529778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Identifying optimum performance trade-offs using a cognitively bounded rational analysis model of discretionary task interleaving.
    Janssen CP; Brumby DP; Dowell J; Chater N; Howes A
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Jan; 3(1):123-39. PubMed ID: 25164177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
    Tanaka H
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
    Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spatial working memory and spatial attention rely on common neural processes in the intraparietal sulcus.
    Silk TJ; Bellgrove MA; Wrafter P; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):718-24. PubMed ID: 20615473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On the role of working memory in spatial contextual cueing.
    Travis SL; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 22642237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Introspection during short-term memory scanning.
    Reyes G; Sackur J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2088-2100. PubMed ID: 30226428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Object selection costs in visual working memory: A diffusion model analysis of the focus of attention.
    Sewell DK; Lilburn SD; Smith PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1673-1693. PubMed ID: 27031324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effects of array structure and secondary cognitive task demand on processes of visual search.
    Savage SW; Potter DD; Tatler BW
    Vision Res; 2018 Dec; 153():37-46. PubMed ID: 30248367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The ticking time bomb: Using eye-tracking methodology to capture attentional processing during gradual time constraints.
    Franco-Watkins AM; Davis ME; Johnson JG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2363-2372. PubMed ID: 27506427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effects of attention pre-allocation and target-background integration on object-based attention.
    Hu F; Jiao C; Zhao S; Dong H; Liu X; Yi Y; Wang J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119414. PubMed ID: 25789772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Target-present guessing as a function of target prevalence and accumulated information in visual search.
    Peltier C; Becker MW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 28185227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The price of information: Increased inspection costs reduce the confirmation bias in visual search.
    Rajsic J; Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):832-849. PubMed ID: 28056636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.