These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26093219)

  • 1. Emotional Stroop Dilution: The boundary conditions of attentional capture by threat words.
    Reynolds MG; Langerak RM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():108-15. PubMed ID: 26093219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint Influence of Visual and Auditory Words in the Stroop Task.
    Francis WS; MacLeod CM; Taylor RS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):200-211. PubMed ID: 27743263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task.
    Thomas SJ; Johnstone SJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Mar; 63(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 17123655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An emotional Stroop task with faces and words. A comparison of young and older adults.
    Agustí AI; Satorres E; Pitarque A; Meléndez JC
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Aug; 53():99-104. PubMed ID: 28654840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anxiety and speaking in people who stutter: an investigation using the emotional Stroop task.
    Hennessey NW; Dourado E; Beilby JM
    J Fluency Disord; 2014 Jun; 40():44-57. PubMed ID: 24929466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A controlled approach to the emotional dilution of the Stroop effect.
    Fackrell K; Edmondson-Jones M; Hall DA
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80141. PubMed ID: 24223219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Don't be afraid of irrelevant words: the emotional Stroop effect is confined to attended words.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(6):1056-68. PubMed ID: 22404379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: an ERP study.
    Gootjes L; Coppens LC; Zwaan RA; Franken IH; Van Strien JW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Mar; 79(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 21156188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflict resolved: On the role of spatial attention in reading and color naming tasks.
    Robidoux S; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1709-16. PubMed ID: 25862427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Animacy and attentional processes: Evidence from the Stroop task.
    Bugaiska A; Grégoire L; Camblats AM; Gelin M; Méot A; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):882-889. PubMed ID: 29716460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Schizotypy and specificity of negative emotions on an emotional Stroop paradigm in the general population.
    Yaffe B; Walder DJ
    Psychiatry Res; 2016 May; 239():291-300. PubMed ID: 27046393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural time course of threat-related attentional bias and interference in panic and obsessive-compulsive disorders.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):116-29. PubMed ID: 23727542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disentangling fast and slow attentional influences of negative and taboo spoken words in the emotional Stroop paradigm.
    Bertels J; Kolinsky R
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Sep; 30(6):1137-48. PubMed ID: 26197360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two distinct patterns of interference in between-attribute Stroop matching tasks.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):563-581. PubMed ID: 27981523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emotional Stroop interference for threatening words is related to reduced EEG δ-β coupling and low attentional control.
    Putman P; Arias-Garcia E; Pantazi I; van Schie C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 May; 84(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 22353580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of attentional slippage in Stroop dilution.
    Park BY; Cho YS
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Nov; 86():103047. PubMed ID: 33220652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Avoiding the approach trap: a response bias theory of the emotional Stroop effect.
    Chajut E; Mama Y; Levy L; Algom D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1567-72. PubMed ID: 20854007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attachment anxiety and attentional control predict immediate and delayed emotional Stroop interference.
    Bailey HN; Paret L; Battista C; Xue Y
    Emotion; 2012 Apr; 12(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 22468618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the automaticity of contingent capture: disruption caused by the attentional blink.
    Du F; Yang J; Yin Y; Zhang K; Abrams RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):944-50. PubMed ID: 23444107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional capture for emotional words and images: The importance of valence and arousal.
    Sutton TM; Lutz C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 73(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 30124315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.