142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26093682)
1. Effect of field of view in the detection of chemically created peri-implant bone defects in bovine ribs using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Pinheiro LR; Gaia BF; Oliveira de Sales MA; Umetsubo OS; Santos Junior O; Cavalcanti MG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Jul; 120(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26093682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Field of View and Acquisition Frame on the Detection of Chemically Simulated Peri-Implant Bone Loss In Vitro.
Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; Augusto de Oliveira Sales M; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Cavalcanti MG
J Periodontol; 2015 Oct; 86(10):1159-65. PubMed ID: 26156676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study.
Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; de Oliveira Sales MA; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):741-750. PubMed ID: 28708906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fractures in dried human skull: an in vitro study.
Eskandarlou A; Poorolajal J; Talaeipour AR; Talebi S; Talaeipour M
Dent Traumatol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23826823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is cone beam computed tomography accurate for postoperative evaluation of implants? An in vitro study.
Vidor MM; Liedke GS; Fontana MP; da Silveira HLD; Arus NA; Lemos A; Vizzotto MB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Nov; 124(5):500-505. PubMed ID: 28867464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Field of View on Detection of Condyle Bone Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Salemi F; Shokri A; Maleki FH; Farhadian M; Dashti G; Ostovarrad F; Ranjzad H
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):644-8. PubMed ID: 27092920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device.
de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Vasconcelos Kde F; Neves FS; Melo SL; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 23217543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.
Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Kılıç C; Yüksel S; Avsever H; Farman A; Scarfe WC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(4):20130332. PubMed ID: 24645965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of enhancement filters in measuring in vitro peri-implant bone level.
de Azevedo Vaz SL; Neves FS; Figueirêdo EP; Haiter-Neto F; Campos PS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1074-7. PubMed ID: 22762154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
Schwindling FS; Hilgenfeld T; Weber D; Kosinski MA; Rammelsberg P; Tasaka A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between different cone-beam computed tomography devices in the detection of mechanically simulated peri-implant bone defects.
Kim JH; Abdala-Júnior R; Munhoz L; Cortes ARG; Watanabe PCA; Costa C; Arita ES
Imaging Sci Dent; 2020 Jun; 50(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 32601588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defect morphology, bone thickness, exposure settings and examiner experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of standardized digital periapical radiographic images but not of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant osseous defects: An in vitro study.
Pelekos G; Tse JMN; Ho D; Tonetti MS
J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 31536645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
Razavi T; Palmer RM; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer PJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 20636726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Dong T; Yuan L; Liu L; Qian Y; Xia L; Ye N; Fang B
Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):8146. PubMed ID: 31148581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of peri-implant buccal bone by computed tomography: an experimental study.
González-Martín O; Oteo C; Ortega R; Alandez J; Sanz M; Veltri M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 26178780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of a cone beam computed tomography metal artifact reduction algorithm for the detection of peri-implant fenestrations and dehiscences.
de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Peyneau PD; Ramirez-Sotelo LR; Vasconcelos Kde F; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 27068312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
